Hotdog
Well-Known Member
Nah, I prefer to ignore fakes. Maybe if I am with your other name.
Alts are stupid, and those that use them are engaging in stupid behavior.
Im not fake bro. Im real. This is happening.
I dont have an alt.
We are besties
Nah, I prefer to ignore fakes. Maybe if I am with your other name.
Alts are stupid, and those that use them are engaging in stupid behavior.
I agree. Thriller isnt whatever it is that Stoked thinks he is. He is fine. You dont have to read what he posts. Dutch did feel a little more like he was bombarding the forum with craziness.
Or maybe its just because he didnt use punctuation or proper grammer. So it stood out.
Im not fake bro. Im real. This is happening.
I dont have an alt.
We are besties
The original post didn't have anything to do with Trump though?Lmfao, distract? Did people forget Trump is ****? That he and GOP leadership and careers need to be voted out?
No, they didn’t. 24/7 burns people out. It’ll be ok to discus this tangent.
If you don’t want to fine. But I still think what I think.
But it's totally OK to focus on Thriller in a conversation that ostensibly began with a GOP ad comparing AOC with the Khmer Rouge, featuring a burning photo fading to skulls.
I mean, I get it, you think he's the worst. But all you've done is distract the conversation away from that to something else, exactly what NPC wanted I imagine.
It’s possible I’m wrong on Thriller. I’ve openly asked, multiple times now. What. The. ****. What am I missing? History has shown me I’m probably wrong.
But to date no one has provided a single legit answer. Not one. So again.
What the hell am I missing?
The original post didn't have anything to do with Trump though?
I mean if you want to have other conversations about other things that's fine of course, but I don't think we need a post saying "but Thriller is also bad!" every time he posts a criticism of the GOP.
It's a fun read if you're willing to push that "show ignored content" button.Why am I being mentioned here? Whoever you’re responding to I have on ignore and I’m not going to reveal their posts to read their crap. But it’s interesting that in response to a campaign slanderous attack ad against AOC shown on ABC, the person you’re arguing with has more of an issue with my posting than with the ad. Quite telling.
I mean, it does go challenged. I've disagreed with him plenty. I think you are mistaking "posts by Thriller I disagree with" with spamming and trolling.Lol, until I’m shown legit arguments otherwise...
It’s not like I’m saying don’t be critical of the GOP. It’s poster specific.
Convince me.
Honest question.
If you saw what you considered “hate” that was posted constantly and went unchallenged would you speak up?
It's a fun read if you're willing to push that "show ignored content" button.
And I agree, to a point. I really don't understand why this has turned into yet another Stoked vs Thriller conversation. They're getting a bit tedious.
Wrong. You suck.
What? Is that why we are besties? It’s been a lonely year.
I mean, it does go challenged. I've disagreed with him plenty. I think you are mistaking "posts by Thriller I disagree with" with spamming and trolling.
There is no possible way you think I suck.

It's a fun read if you're willing to push that "show ignored content" button.
And I agree, to a point. I really don't understand why this has turned into yet another Stoked vs Thriller conversation. They're getting a bit tedious.
I'm really not that interested to have this conversation. You're allowed to have your own opinions of the guy. I do think it's a little obsessive that you keep bringing it up, especially on posts of his that aren't objectionable in the least.Disagreeing with a post isn’t the same.
If a poster came on here and was like “**** women” would you be like “I disagree” or would you push back harder?
Again, back to point.
What the ****? I’m clearly the outlier. I realize I’m on an island, alone. I like to grow, learn and improve. So what am I missing? I truly dont see it
I'm really not that interested to have this conversation. You're allowed to have your own opinions of the guy. I do think it's a little obsessive that you keep bringing it up, especially on posts of his that aren't objectionable in the least.
It's nuts to me that someone created that ad, and ABC ran it. It's one of the most disgusting political ads I've seen, and it's not like she's in the middle of a campaign or anything, so it's very random. But yeah, the right absolutely has a some sort of creepy obsession with her.I thought we’d discuss the ad and how it’s unbelievably inappropriate. Or how so many in right have an unreal obsession with AOC? Or how we have no idea what socialism means anymore. It’s just a “scary” word republicans throw out to label anything they disagree with?
Well, I haven’t engaged with stoked in weeks. I even sent him a private message maybe a month ago to stop trying to talk to me. I then put him on ignore. So if these stoked vs thriller conversations are becoming tedious, it’s because one poster is bringing it up, not me.
Like those with an unhealthy fetish with AOC (maybe because deep down they know she’s right?), maybe those with an unhealthy obsession with me can just let it go? Or just put me on ignore? I’ve done it and I never look back. I lose nothing by ignoring posters who make reading this forum tedious or frustrating.
Being anti Trump, or talking about things the GOP is doing that you find abhorrent isn't "hate."So is spamming GD 24/7 with anti trump. The Heathme of the left.
**** him and his hate.
Again, I’ve been provided no rebuttal
In another week I’ll challenge someone else to be disappointed.
