The Thriller
Well-Known Member
Seems like an odd time to be whining about The Times. I mean with a potential regional conflict in the Middle East and all.
He’s just so thought provoking!
Seems like an odd time to be whining about The Times. I mean with a potential regional conflict in the Middle East and all.
He’s just so thought provoking!
Seems like an odd time to be whining about The Times. I mean with a potential regional conflict in the Middle East and all.
He’s just so thought provoking!
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/09/17/best-evidence-obstruction-justice/
--To be clear, the president has no authority to tell a witness not to show up. The president has no absolute immunity to prevent ex-aides from testifying. And he really has no basis for instructing a private citizen who never served in the White House to obstruct an investigation. And that is what he did, according to Lewandowski.
--And so it goes. At this point the most glaring obstruction, the most comprehensible, is the president’s obstruction of impeachment hearings. If a president can prevent the House from formulating impeachment articles, then the president has literally no constitutional restraint on his conduct.
It’ll be interesting if norms like these have been permanently damaged by Trump. Or if the next few presidents will return to act like most presidents and don’t like... obstruct justice and abuse power like this.
And I’m old enough to remember when people claimed that having an inexperienced president like trump would enable congress to flex its muscles. They’re now more subservient than ever to the executive.
How’s Congress supposed to hold the executive accountable with one hand tied behind their backs?
During the Obama administration there was detainment when there was a prosecutable crime IN ADDITION to illegal entry into the country. Under Trump there is detainment and family separation for ALL PEOPLE who enter the country illegally.Concentration camps? Wasn’t Obama doing the same exact thing?
During the Obama administration there was detainment when there was a prosecutable crime IN ADDITION to illegal entry into the country. Under Trump there is detainment and family separation for ALL PEOPLE who enter the country illegally.
Muh State's rights! Oh wait Republicans only believe in that when it comes to abortion.
This seems significant
"News"week
"News"week
Hi
I'm trying to gauge how bad pancake thievery is on the dijon mustard to tan suit scale.
Muh State's rights! Oh wait Republicans only believe in that when it comes to abortion.
They did. The IRS refused.Silly question, why the prosecutors do not ask that data directly from the IRS?
Not sure. Probably not quite that easily... but the key is that people want to view Trump's individual tax statements, not just the Trump Corporation ones. And individual returns are generally protected under privacy laws. Except that there's a law saying that the appropriate congressional committee can request and MUST RECEIVE the tax information for anyone they want to investigate. The IRS is currently violating that law by refusing to turn over Trump's tax returns, which is why they are resorting to trying to get the info a different way.At least in Estonia and probably in EU too an ordinary person can view full audit including profits, dividends, salary etc for any registered company? Some basic data is free, but full audit etc (which might be a lot of A4 pages) costs only some euros.
For example:
https://ariregister.rik.ee/index?lang=eng
And type company name. For example, Philip Morris or Pipedrive.
Doesn't USA have anything like that?
They did. The IRS refused.
Not sure. Probably not quite that easily... but the key is that people want to view Trump's individual tax statements, not just the Trump Corporation ones. And individual returns are generally protected under privacy laws. Except that there's a law saying that the appropriate congressional committee can request and MUST RECEIVE the tax information for anyone they want to investigate. The IRS is currently violating that law by refusing to turn over Trump's tax returns, which is why they are resorting to trying to get the info a different way.
In Norway, where tax records have been public since the founding of the modern state in 1814, a newspaper put the records online in 2001. One study estimated that the records’ greater availability caused a 3.1 percent increase in the reported incomes of self-employed Norwegians over the next three years, perhaps because they feared exposure.
Disclosure also could help to reduce disparities in income, as well as disparities in tax payments. Inequality is easier to ignore in the absence of evidence. In Finland, where tax data is published each year on Nov. 1 — jovially known as National Jealousy Day — people treat the information as a barometer of whether inequality is yawning too wide.