What's new

The Honesty of Transgender Identity

Status
Not open for further replies.
Admittedly I dont understand the transgender thing.

Let's say you were a girl who felt like you were a boy. If you had never seen or heard of a boy ever in your life and your tribe or community was made soley of girls, how would you know were a boy on the inside? The scenario of you wanting a sex change wouldnt exist. You would just be what you are.

Mentally, gender is a social construct. Biologically it is not.

So imo, society, friends, parents, personal experience, etc is what is influencing people to want a sex change. Its not something you come up with on your own because you are getting signals from inside that you are a different sex.

When someone says they they are a boy or girl trapped in the opposite sex's body, Im not sure I buy that. It very well could be just a phase, which a lot of times it turns out to be.

Should transgender people have the same rights as everyone else? Absolutely, dress and act however you want. Also, leave kids under 18 alone. Thats the thing that bugs me. Parents transitioning their youngs kids is abhorrent and should be illegal.
 
I think you, myself and many others have been educated and more informed about transgender on Jazzfanz over the years.

I don't think that joke is funny. I can see the point people try to make while saying it, if I'm going to be perfectly honest. Do you?
Yes I get the point of the joke. It is pretty similar to the "joke" that sprang up in regard to gay marriage, the "What are we gonna do next, let people marry their dog?" one. It is obviously comparing transgender identity to an absurdity, implying that it is just some arbitrary decision and specifically that it is a decision to be something that you are not.

I suppose you could claim that in addition to the things I've mentioned, it is making a comparison to something that we would generally find offensive, a caucasian person identifying as an Asian person. Making the point that a person with privilege assumes the identity of a group that has endured oppression. Now expecting all of the empathy while having suffered none of the consequences.
 
The point is indeed quite obvious. It's based on cluelessness, a lack of empathy, and a denial of reality, but it is very clear.

I think it's just what people want to accept. Both of them would be clear examples of people who mentally feel their body does not align with their body.

To each their own. Live and let live. One of the best things that happened to me was understanding that everyone is different and to support them as long as it doesn't involve breaking the law. As the cliche goes, life is incredibly short. Live it your way. Find your happiness.

Too many people try set norms on people. It's unhealthy and ****s people up. Gameface sharing personal things that are very easy for some to not understand and to criticize is brave. I can see why he's so emotionally involved in the topic.
 
Yes I get the point of the joke. It is pretty similar to the "joke" that sprang up in regard to gay marriage, the "What are we gonna do next, let people marry their dog?" one. It is obviously comparing transgender identity to an absurdity, implying that it is just some arbitrary decision and specifically that it is a decision to be something that you are not.

I suppose you could claim that in addition to the things I've mentioned, it is making a comparison to something that we would generally find offensive, a caucasian person identifying as an Asian person. Making the point that a person with privilege assumes the identity of a group that has endured oppression. Now expecting all of the empathy while having suffered none of the consequences.

To me, the people who said, what's next, letting people marry their dog is far more ignorant and offensive.


Correct me if I'm wrong but gender, race and ethnicity are all social constructs. Why is it more absurd if someone feels they're a different race than someone who feels they were born with the wrong genitals?
 
I suppose you could claim that in addition to the things I've mentioned, it is making a comparison to something that we would generally find offensive, a caucasian person identifying as an Asian person. Making the point that a person with privilege assumes the identity of a group that has endured oppression. Now expecting all of the empathy while having suffered none of the consequences.

There are women who feel the same way about transgender people born male. Some say it's offensive because they don't know what it's like being a female and the troubles females have in society. (Although, to me, transgender people have had it far worse than women - generally speaking.)
 
Mentally, gender is a social construct. Biologically it is not.

Hence, the way people distinguish gender and birth sex.

So imo, society, friends, parents, personal experience, etc is what is influencing people to want a sex change. Its not something you come up with on your own because you are getting signals from inside that you are a different sex.

Why can't it be both?

Also, leave kids under 18 alone. Thats the thing that bugs me. Parents transitioning their youngs kids is abhorrent and should be illegal.

What if 'leaving the kid alone' means that the kid transitions? What's your position then?
 
To me, the people who said, what's next, letting people marry their dog is far more ignorant and offensive.

I agree. However, I think the goal should be 'not ignorant and offensive', as opposed to 'less ignorant and offensive'.

Correct me if I'm wrong but gender, race and ethnicity are all social constructs. Why is it more absurd if someone feels they're a different race than someone who feels they were born with the wrong genitals?

The offered example was 'can I identify as Chinese'. Chinese isn't a race, it's a common cultural distillation of many individual cultures that signifies a great deal about the types of stories you were told, the expectation of the society you were raised in, etc. Any person raised in China by Chinese parents would be Chinese, regardless of skin color.

What would it even men to feel like you were a different race? That you were treated as a member of that race?
 
There are women who feel the same way about transgender people born male. Some say it's offensive because they don't know what it's like being a female and the troubles females have in society. (Although, to me, transgender people have had it far worse than women - generally speaking.)

So. we agree that they suffer the consequences.
 
I agree. However, I think the goal should be 'not ignorant and offensive', as opposed to 'less ignorant and offensive'.

Did what I write state that the goal should be anything less?


The offered example was 'can I identify as Chinese'. Chinese isn't a race, it's a common cultural distillation of many individual cultures that signifies a great deal about the types of stories you were told, the expectation of the society you were raised in, etc. Any person raised in China by Chinese parents would be Chinese, regardless of skin color.

What would it even men to feel like you were a different race? That you were treated as a member of that race?

Sure. On the example using "Chinese" but you're being shortsighted if you're just taking that one example as a literal example and failing to understand what people mean. Unless, of course, you're not familiar with people saying things like this. Substitute GF's exmaple of Chinese and use the term Asain, black, "insert any other cultural construct.*

A good example would be the white professor that identified as being black.
 
Hence, the way people distinguish gender and birth sex.



Why can't it be both?



What if 'leaving the kid alone' means that the kid transitions? What's your position then?

Well, it can't be both because your knowledge of the opposite sex is external. Its a social construct. You only want to change sex because of what you are observing on the outside. If you never saw or heard of the opposite sex you would not even be thinking about it.

What I mean by leave the kids alone is not allowing or suggesting hormone therapy on kids. If the kid wants to dress and act like the opposite sex then fine, but starting hormone therapy on kids is BS, even if they ask for it. You dont think so?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top