I can see the point people try to make while saying it, if I'm going to be perfectly honest. Do you?
The point is indeed quite obvious. It's based on cluelessness, a lack of empathy, and a denial of reality, but it is very clear.
I can see the point people try to make while saying it, if I'm going to be perfectly honest. Do you?
Yes I get the point of the joke. It is pretty similar to the "joke" that sprang up in regard to gay marriage, the "What are we gonna do next, let people marry their dog?" one. It is obviously comparing transgender identity to an absurdity, implying that it is just some arbitrary decision and specifically that it is a decision to be something that you are not.I think you, myself and many others have been educated and more informed about transgender on Jazzfanz over the years.
I don't think that joke is funny. I can see the point people try to make while saying it, if I'm going to be perfectly honest. Do you?
The point is indeed quite obvious. It's based on cluelessness, a lack of empathy, and a denial of reality, but it is very clear.
Yes I get the point of the joke. It is pretty similar to the "joke" that sprang up in regard to gay marriage, the "What are we gonna do next, let people marry their dog?" one. It is obviously comparing transgender identity to an absurdity, implying that it is just some arbitrary decision and specifically that it is a decision to be something that you are not.
I suppose you could claim that in addition to the things I've mentioned, it is making a comparison to something that we would generally find offensive, a caucasian person identifying as an Asian person. Making the point that a person with privilege assumes the identity of a group that has endured oppression. Now expecting all of the empathy while having suffered none of the consequences.
I suppose you could claim that in addition to the things I've mentioned, it is making a comparison to something that we would generally find offensive, a caucasian person identifying as an Asian person. Making the point that a person with privilege assumes the identity of a group that has endured oppression. Now expecting all of the empathy while having suffered none of the consequences.
Mentally, gender is a social construct. Biologically it is not.
So imo, society, friends, parents, personal experience, etc is what is influencing people to want a sex change. Its not something you come up with on your own because you are getting signals from inside that you are a different sex.
Also, leave kids under 18 alone. Thats the thing that bugs me. Parents transitioning their youngs kids is abhorrent and should be illegal.
To me, the people who said, what's next, letting people marry their dog is far more ignorant and offensive.
Correct me if I'm wrong but gender, race and ethnicity are all social constructs. Why is it more absurd if someone feels they're a different race than someone who feels they were born with the wrong genitals?
There are women who feel the same way about transgender people born male. Some say it's offensive because they don't know what it's like being a female and the troubles females have in society. (Although, to me, transgender people have had it far worse than women - generally speaking.)
I agree. However, I think the goal should be 'not ignorant and offensive', as opposed to 'less ignorant and offensive'.
The offered example was 'can I identify as Chinese'. Chinese isn't a race, it's a common cultural distillation of many individual cultures that signifies a great deal about the types of stories you were told, the expectation of the society you were raised in, etc. Any person raised in China by Chinese parents would be Chinese, regardless of skin color.
What would it even men to feel like you were a different race? That you were treated as a member of that race?
Hence, the way people distinguish gender and birth sex.
Why can't it be both?
What if 'leaving the kid alone' means that the kid transitions? What's your position then?