What's new
By:

The official "let's impeach Trump" thread

Stefanik seems desperate to try and make herself a “victim” of sexism.

Again, republicans must be winning the facts and arguments of this hearing if this is their strategy.
 
JazzyFresh said:
Or how about the person that you fairy tale story writers say was extorted saying he was extorted instead of saying he wasn't?

Crazy concept...

"Hey Trump extorted you"

-No he didn't

"Yes he did because a person who's father's daughter brothers Aunt said it happened."
Click to expand...

Considering what he has to lose, why would he do that?
 
The Thriller said:
Stefanik seems desperate to try and make herself a “victim” of sexism.

Again, republicans must be winning the facts and arguments of this hearing if this is their strategy.
Click to expand...
Lol that's all you have? Lol really that's all you have...

You haven't said jack shot about the actual crime but this is your concern.

Nice strategy
 
So we have learned absolutely nothing besides the two star witnesses yesterday(the day before)couldn't answer that Trump should be impeached and that Shifty lied about not knowing the whistleblower who everyone else already knows and his own staff met with.

Oh and sexual harassment blah blah according to The Twillbot.
 
JazzyFresh said:
Lol ANOTHER hypothetical.

Why would someone whose was extorted say he was extorted?

Damn dude. Duh.
Click to expand...

"Damn dude. Duh." Really? Is there a reason you're being condescending? I'm respectful toward you, aren't I? Have some class and basic civility.

All we have are hypotheticals. You don't have proof of anything either-- we're all common citizens with no access to anything but what the news spins at us, and we're trying to make sense of a situation with opinions and conjecture.

That said, being as objective as we can be, don't you think he stands a lot to lose, as the new leader of a nation depending heavily on US aid? It's a fairly neutral question.
 
olden_undercover said:
"Damn dude. Duh." Really? Is there a reason you're being condescending? I'm respectful toward you, aren't I? Have some class and basic civility.

All we have are hypotheticals. You don't have proof of anything either-- we're all common citizens with no access to anything but what the news spins at us, and we're trying to make sense of a situation with opinions and conjecture.

That said, being as objective as we can be, don't you think he stands a lot to lose, as the new leader of a nation depending heavily on US aid? It's a fairly neutral question.
Click to expand...
Sorry I pinned you in with the rest. These people are far from civil and have called me some amazingly nasty things.

Yes, I agree it's all hypotheticals but I'm not the one trying to impeach an elected president. Many people here and on the left think this isn't an extremely extremely serious matter and using hypotheticals to impeach a person America elected is acceptable. Its not in my eyes. This is a clown show.

As far as your question, no. I think he has every outlet to come out and say he was extorted without any reprucussions. I actually think a president put in place to get rid of the corruption that has plagued his nation would come out and say it was extortion.

Edit: I apologize again.
 
Last edited:
olden_undercover said:
"Damn dude. Duh." Really? Is there a reason you're being condescending? I'm respectful toward you, aren't I? Have some class and basic civility.

All we have are hypotheticals. You don't have proof of anything either-- we're all common citizens with no access to anything but what the news spins at us, and we're trying to make sense of a situation with opinions and conjecture.

That said, being as objective as we can be, don't you think he stands a lot to lose, as the new leader of a nation depending heavily on US aid? It's a fairly neutral question.
Click to expand...
You have to forgive him. He gets riled up way too easy.


Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top