What's new

The official "let's impeach Trump" thread



I would start by disbelieving reports lacking evidence...... at least date, time and a phone call record from the phone company.

However, Trump has learned that his official calls on secure lines are routinely "leaked" to the Press and the whole damn world. We need to find the leakers and prosecutde severely before you start on Trump.

If Trump had a ho string two tin cans together and connect them to Trump and whoever needs to be securely contacted, he'd be doing better than anything our agencies can do. well, will do for him.

Overall, it's the guilty accusing Trump of all they have done, for all they're worth, hoping to make us sick of the topic before we can get them sent to the jails they should be in.

For the progressives "liberals" or managerial folks worldwide, it's now "but but but.... it's about us first."
 
I'm seriously not the least bit worried. I would be very happy if they voted tomorrow because then the House would lose all of its control over this process.
As soon as they vote on ACTUAL impeachment, then the senate takes over.
Do you really think the Senate is going to vote to remove? (it takes 67 votes)
So go ahead.

I still say that the vote will never happen. Even if it did, it wouldn't matter.

I disagree. This is such a prominent spectacle, it's likely to become "standard" American conduct. Every day it goes on, it destroys people's respect or reason. It's disgusting. shameful, and destructive.

responsible and civic-minded elected officials would not waste their time or our money on this.

And I don't really "believe" in the Senate, either. McConnell is a deep-state permapower man. As corrupt as any. He just have to act the part for the folks at home, and try to conceal his real self. I hold him responsible like Pelosi or Feinstein or Obama or Hillary for compromising my rights, our economy, and actual decency around the world.

And I don't believe in our electoral process. Too many interested people working on the registrations, the advertising, the street, the polls, and the count. Pretty worried they can get the result they want if they care to apply themselves with sufficient determination.

The only substantial hope is that some of us wake up and begin to participate effectively. Honesty is a pretty subtle thing sometimes..... pretty hard to check ourselves unless we recognize the problem of partisanship, or determine that we can't afford the "elite" management.
 
Did our new trolling alt, porcupinetree, get banned yet?

I think you'd like China. I hear they do an excellent job of moderating discussions over there, and I'm sure you'd fit right in. Of course, it's a bit risky. You can never absolutely depend on how anyone will understand anything. Maybe somebody would think you're a nuisance and call in the paddy wagon. I hear the camps are good, though. Doesn't Nike use the free labor to make shoes there? And isn't that where all the NBA gear is made?

And the alt game is fun, somehow. There really are just too few people willing to participate in here. So, really, I think we should encourage alts, particularly alts who can pretend to have different opinions.
I would love to have some intelligence in here, maybe an Ain't or a Pearl, lets say.
 
If the losses in Ky and La make Trump look bad, it's surely at least partly because he, of his own free will, made the races about himself. At the Ky rally, contemplating a Republican loss, he said "You can't let that happen to me". At the final Louisiana rally, he said "So you gotta give me a big win, please, okay? Okay?" What's the common thread there? ME.

The media of course hones in on, and plays footage of, comments like that, since they interpret it as Trump making those elections at least in part a referendum on himself. But those were his words, he raised the stakes himself, and we can't possibly be surprised if he centralized himself, that's what he does. The world revolves around Trump. Does not matter if the results say anything about 2020. But, at the same time, one can't expect Trump opponents not to point out the obvious: he linked himself to the elections, and he lost.
 
Yeah, but I think it’s really hard to separate from the context of the same governor winning in a landslide the year before Trump took Louisiana by 20 points, yet a narrow victory this time. We can nuance this, but it’s hard to explain such a massive variance, to the point that it makes any pontificating on this election as some generalization the equivalent of homeytennis just suggesting that if you put Tony Bradley’s per minute numbers to scale on Gobert, that they’re fairly similar.

I don't know anything at all about this, but Trump went there three times, and someone on a talk show said the R didn't have any ground game.... no signs, no volunteers. And I saw his pic. Looked like death warmed over.

Incumbents have some advantages, probably enough so to survive even a popular Presidential endorsement, unless they are themselves objectionable like the Kentucky gov.

I'd guess that there are a lot of people there who really were more disgusted by Hillary. Other than that, folks usually part ways about 50/50 over anything.

For Trump, it is a consideration to have some Rs on the ground and in office anywhere, and I think he's gonna go where ever he can to get that support, if he can.
 
What annoys me the most is the obvious partisanship shown by most of the posters on the impeachment issue. I support the impeachment process running it’s course, and if the findings are good enough to impeach Trump then so be it. There’s plenty to suspect about him (see Manafort).

But to imply that there’s no reason to investigate Biden is ludicrous. People putting their party in front of the american people’s interests is the most anti-american position I can think of.
 
But to imply that there’s no reason to investigate Biden is ludicrous. People putting their party in front of the american people’s interests is the most anti-american position I can think of.

What is the reason to investigate Biden?
 
Back
Top