Thread for responding to lies spread by JazzyFresh

[Beer]

For ignoramuses like @Red @One Brow @LogGrad98 (all pathological liars). Read up. Educate yourself for once

Breonna Taylor Summary-Redacted1

Exclusive: TatumReport.comBreonna Taylor3003 Springfield Drive #4Louisville, KY 40214(Accurint – April 2016 to Present)DOB:

www.yumpu.com

1st off. I am very against the war on drugs. I believe it is an extreme waste of money and ruins poor communities who are able to be much more heavily policed because of it. That being said, the law is the law right now. So it's kind of got to be upheld.

Am I the only one that thought this was very interesting? @One Brow How do you think this absolves her? Seems like at minimum she was knowingly moving money between drug dealers and at maximum she was a very active participant in the drug trade. The fact that she was an EMT in training or what not does not absolve her despite what the media says.

Not totally sure how her current BF plays into all of this as keeping all the names straight was confusing. But all the very obvious drug dealers seemed to be pretty close to him and seemed to think he was a moron for shooting his gun into the unknown.

So a few things. Technically the police were well within their rights to enter the home. And in my opinion the BF was within his rights to shoot. Which then made the police well within their rights to return fire. Now if the docs are accurate they had pretty good reason to suspect Breonna or her BF or whomever lived at that residence to be active drug dealers. And the law, which is stupid but it is the law, basically gives police full authority to go after said drug dealers.

So once again it seems like idiot vs idiot and someone got killed. Very similar to the other deaths over the past few months.

It is so hard to take a side when it seems like both sides suck ***,

 

[JazzyFresh]

This was your exact response:

His response was "but Mitch Mcconnell!!!".

And he did not say that at all. He provided context you left out. He provided the relevant information to understanding the topic at hand, you said:

I couldn't give a damn about that *** hat. Mitch Mcconnell is garbage.

So you were given the relevant information and decided to express your opinion. Doesn't make it any less relevant just because you disregard it.

Lol what? You're just playing dense now. His response was flat out a whataboutism. It's like me blaming Pelosi for Trump's late covid response. My question had zero to do with Mitch. None, nodda, zip, zero. It's not relevant at all to Obamas staff alleging he(NOT MITCH) allowed Russia to meddle to get Putins ok on the Iran deal. Mitch had zero to do with that. Absolute zero.

 

[JazzyFresh]

1st off. I am very against the war on drugs. I believe it is an extreme waste of money and ruins poor communities who are able to be much more heavily policed because of it. That being said, the law is the law right now. So it's kind of got to be upheld.

Am I the only one that thought this was very interesting? @One Brow How do you think this absolves her? Seems like at minimum she was knowingly moving money between drug dealers and at maximum she was a very active participant in the drug trade. The fact that she was an EMT in training or what not does not absolve her despite what the media says.

Not totally sure how her current BF plays into all of this as keeping all the names straight was confusing. But all the very obvious drug dealers seemed to be pretty close to him and seemed to think he was a moron for shooting his gun into the unknown.

So a few things. Technically the police were well within their rights to enter the home. And in my opinion the BF was within his rights to shoot. Which then made the police well within their rights to return fire. Now if the docs are accurate they had pretty good reason to suspect Breonna or her BF or whomever lived at that residence to be active drug dealers. And the law, which is stupid but it is the law, basically gives police full authority to go after said drug dealers.

So once again it seems like idiot vs idiot and someone got killed. Very similar to the other deaths over the past few months.

It is so hard to take a side when it seems like both sides suck ***,

Unfortunate and I think most agree that this needs to be looked into as far as reform but as you point out, she and her bf weren't exactly saints in all of this. Did she deserve to die? No, but her bf shot first. It's not like they shot for no reason.

 

[Beer]

Unfortunate and I think most agree that this needs to be looked into as far as reform but as you point out, she and her bf weren't exactly saints in all of this. Did she deserve to die? No, but her bf shot first. It's not like they shot for no reason.

Her BF shooting first kind of makes all of the wanting criminal charges a moot point. Like it or not.

 

[JazzyFresh]

Still waiting for that response about a poster here threatening to assassinate Trump but in the meantime here's this for you guys to "whataboutism" can you please keep it in Biden? No you won't ...

Hunter Biden received $3.5M wire transfer from Russian billionaire: Senate report

The committees also said they obtained records from the US Treasury Department that “show potential criminal activity relating to transactions among and between Hunter Biden, his family, and his associates with Ukrainian, Russian, Kazakh and Chinese nationals.”

The report adds, “The records also note that some of these transactions are linked to what ‘appears to be an Eastern European prostitution or human trafficking ring.’”

Redirect Notice

 

[JazzyFresh]

Obama's cyber security response to being told to stand down by Mitch Mc ....err I mean Susan Rice on Russian interference.

“I was incredulous and in disbelief,” Prieto is quoted as saying in the book. “It took me a moment to process. In my head, I was like, did I hear that correctly?” Prieto told the authors he then spoke up, asking Daniel: “Why the hell are we standing down? Michael, can you help us understand?”

 

[JazzyFresh]

Because then I will approve of breaking into the apartment of an innocent person, in the presence of her innocent boyfriend, on a no-knock warrant, and when the legally-carrying boyfriend defends his home from what he thinks is a home invasion, the only crime is shooting into the apartment of the white people next door?



Links only matter when dealing with people who care about proper information.

She was on the warrant not innocent.... They did too knock...
Her bf. shot first.

That's why I need links and you never provide them. You cant, you are the liar.

 

[One Brow]

Still waiting for proof.

Of what?

You just probably corelate it to your great grandparents and grandparents saying it.

Yes. Also other family, people in high school, politicians, etc. I've heard similar notions all my life, from all over.

Now, I don't know what you have heard, which is why I offered that as a caution.

There's no other explanation as to why you saw race in that comment unless someone close to you used it racistly.

Heard it as an expression of racism, absolutely. I have not used "in the blood", because I don't think it's accurate.

 

[One Brow]

Am I the only one that thought this was very interesting? @One Brow How do you think this absolves her? Seems like at minimum she was knowingly moving money between drug dealers and at maximum she was a very active participant in the drug trade. The fact that she was an EMT in training or what not does not absolve her despite what the media says.

What in it convicts her? The only person who says she was moving money is Glover, talking to the mother of his child, saying Taylor had the money in her apartment but the police did say anything about finding it. However, there is a later conversation with an unidentified woman, and she confirms she still has Glover's money. Meanwhile, Glover goes out of his way to point out all of Taylor's possessions (car, etc.) were purchased legitimately. When Glover goes into the drug house, Taylor stays in the car. She doesn't seem to use.

Not totally sure how her current BF plays into all of this as keeping all the names straight was confusing. But all the very obvious drug dealers seemed to be pretty close to him and seemed to think he was a moron for shooting his gun into the unknown.

There is an A. Walker (one of Glover's fellow dealers) and K. Walker (Taylor's girlfriend). Glover only mentions K. Walker as Taylor's new guy.

Now if the docs are accurate they had pretty good reason to suspect Breonna or her BF or whomever lived at that residence to be active drug dealers.

One of the details I did not see in the document was that the police asked the USPS to monitor deliveries to Taylor, and they said there was nothing suspicious.

No where in the document does Taylor use drugs, unless I missed something. She dated a dealer and loved a dealer, but that doesn't make her a dealer.

 

[JazzyFresh]

Yes. Also other family, people in high school, politicians, etc. I've heard similar notions all my life, from all over.

Now, I don't know what you have heard, which is why I offered that as a caution.



Heard it as an expression of racism, absolutely. I have not used "in the blood", because I don't think it's accurate.

Says a lot about who you affiliate yourself with. I don't hang around with racist people so that's why I've never heard it used in racism like you.

It's always been my theory that people like you, red, Thriller, naos all have white guilt because subconsciously you know your bloodline was guilty of slavery. Me... I know mine helped and fought evil so I have no shame or feel no responsibility for what Democrats did. That's why I say, "it's in the blood". So please don't confuse my saying for what your friends in hoods say.

 

[Gameface]

Oh my, and I thought I put time into this graph months ago. Maybe I need to update it given JazzyFresh's most recent activity. Take a break and enjoy a beer @One Brow
View attachment 9780

post of the ****ing year!

 

[One Brow]

My question had zero to do with Mitch. None, nodda, zip, zero. It's not relevant at all to Obamas staff alleging he(NOT MITCH) allowed Russia to meddle to get Putins ok on the Iran deal. Mitch had zero to do with that. Absolute zero.

You can ignore the political realities, and it does not bother me, but ignoring reality does not prove your position. If your point is that you think Obama made errors or political decisions, well duh.

Still waiting for that response about a poster here threatening to assassinate Trump

Offered here:

I find that believable, but given the nature of some of our posters, think it was likely just rhetoric and not a genuine threat. If you believe this is a legitimate threat, it's your patriotic duty to report this to the secret service. If you don't, you're just trying to stir up trouble. Either way, it's a bad look for you to just bring it up in here.

Hunter Biden received $3.5M wire transfer from Russian billionaire: Senate report

The committees also said they obtained records from the US Treasury Department that “show potential criminal activity relating to transactions among and between Hunter Biden, his family, and his associates with Ukrainian, Russian, Kazakh and Chinese nationals.”

If it turns out Hunter Biden committed crimes, I support his being tried. I will never vote for Hunter Biden for President, unless he is running against Donald Jr./Ivanka/Eric.

Obama's cyber security response to being told to stand down by Mitch Mc ....err I mean Susan Rice on Russian interference.

I agree Obama made a mistake in putting politics first.