Thread for responding to lies spread by JazzyFresh

[Deleted member 365]

I think you are both partly correct. You can't expect allies to be perfect, but you also can't just overlook serious and relevant imperfections.

I think that’s fair. Really I do. And I’ll admit that I don’t read every post out there. But it seems to me like in every of these incidents, the first reaction has been to blame the victim. It isn’t until after pages of pages with debating (usually with you) when there’s an admission that the police were in the wrong.

I’m fine with people supportive of police reform being imperfect. I get that there’s nuance. I just struggle sometimes to see these people as allies when their first reaction seemingly every time is to blame the POC who's clearly the victim. Especially since we’ve seen so many cases over the last few years destroying the facade that the police can and should be trusted. There’s just too much data out now that POC are over policed, disproportionately incarcerated, and obviously treated differently than whites.

 

[One Brow]

...

"A building", so apparently not the same building. Unless you think BLM is combing through county property records, sounds like coincidence.

 

[One Brow]

In late July 2016, U.S. intelligence agencies obtained insight into Russian intelligence analysis alleging that U.S. Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton had approved a campaign plan ...

Enjoy your fiction.

 

[Gameface]

Enjoy your fiction.

FanFiction is really popular atm.

 

[One Brow]

Soo they're allowing Biden to wear an ear piece and take amphetamines to stimulate his brain eh?

Nope.

It's not even a question now that Hillary and the Obama administration committed full out treason.

No, it's a Russian lie.

Intel chief releases Russian disinfo on Hillary Clinton that was rejected by bipartisan Senate panel

Former top officials were aghast at the move by John Ratcliffe, the director of national intelligence.

www.politico.com

“It’s very disturbing to me that, 35 days before an election, the director of national intelligence would release unverified Russian rumint,” or rumor intelligence, Senate Intelligence Committee Vice Chairman Mark Warner (D-Va.) told reporters.

And several former senior intelligence officials described Ratcliffe’s move as incendiary and irresponsible, given the manner in which he was publicly releasing unverified information that originated from a foreign adversary.

I really wouldn't expect Democrats to acknowledge Trump doing good things like fighting sex trafficking.

Lot's of Democrats have acknowledged the good things done by Trump.

This has to piss Democrats off sooo bad. With how violent they are and all. Remember your highest seat called peace a "distraction".

He went [ahead] and negotiated against all advice, but he did it with common sense.

Quite the hagiography for a minor deal with the low-hanging fruit.

Trump wiping the floor. Hillary now Biden... Embarrassing when you had a moderate progressive like Tulsi who would've crushed both these dudes. Gotta protect Obama and his KGB though.

Trump is indeed the ineffective speaker's notion of an effective speaker.

If Obamacare was so great, why did Obama wait last minute(last day) to sign up for it?

He wasn't allowed to sign for it when he had alternate insurance through his employer.

 

[JazzyFresh]

Nope.



No, it's a Russian lie.

Intel chief releases Russian disinfo on Hillary Clinton that was rejected by bipartisan Senate panel

Former top officials were aghast at the move by John Ratcliffe, the director of national intelligence.

www.politico.com

“It’s very disturbing to me that, 35 days before an election, the director of national intelligence would release unverified Russian rumint,” or rumor intelligence, Senate Intelligence Committee Vice Chairman Mark Warner (D-Va.) told reporters.

And several former senior intelligence officials described Ratcliffe’s move as incendiary and irresponsible, that originated from a foreign adversary.



Lot's of Democrats have acknowledged the good things done by Trump.



Quite the hagiography for a minor deal with the low-hanging fruit.



Trump is indeed the ineffective speaker's notion of an effective speaker.



He wasn't allowed to sign for it when he had alternate insurance through his employer.

Wow one link and one that has witnessed by name but "given the manner in which he was publicly releasing unverified information".

is that like an anonymous source? No because we have actual evidence that it happened. Lol of course you provide an absolute hypocrite, double standard answer with the very first link you provide. Funny how the ENTIRE RUSSIA HOAX was unverified information. Lol you can make this up am you did.

 

[JazzyFresh]

Enjoy your fiction.

There is written proof by John Brennen lol.

 

[JazzyFresh]

I don't recall anyone claiming there were illegal monetary ties. The legal monetary ties are more than enough concern.

This is a bold faced lie lol. Google search. Providing links is reaaaly hard especially when it's simply a google sentence away fro proving you, a pathological liar, wrong.

Search: trump illegal ties to Russia money

Google Search

www.google.com

 

[One Brow]

Wow one link and one that has witnessed by name but "given the manner in which he was publicly releasing unverified information".

is that like an anonymous source?

Sort of, in that the unverified Russian intelligence to which he is referring seems to be anonymous, at least to us.

No because we have actual evidence that it happened.

You can't verified an unverified report by pointing to information in that unverified report.

Lol of course you provide an absolute hypocrite, double standard answer with the very first link you provide.

"You're literally only mad because I dismantled everything you stand for."

Funny how the ENTIRE RUSSIA HOAX was unverified information.

Mueller went through and verified many things about it in his report.

There is written proof by John Brennen lol.

Like all good intelligence chiefs, Brennan likely provide some information that was unverified, as well as some that was verified. This bit may of been among it. It's still unverified information, and likely Russian propaganda.

This is a bold faced lie lol. Google search.

Four of the first 5 links (one was behind a paywall. Some of them said there could have been illegal contributions, none of them said there were illegal contributions. A couple said what was legal is bad enough.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/trumps-businesses-are-full-of-dirty-russian-money-the-scandal-is-thats-legal/2019/03/29/11b812da-5171-11e9-88a1-ed346f0ec94f_story.html

Following the Money: Trump and Russia-Linked Transactions From the Campaign to the Presidential Inauguration

At the heart of the inquiry into the alleged collusion between Trump and Russia is money. It provides concrete evidence of relationships, methods, and motives.

www.americanprogress.org

If Trump Is Laundering Russian Money, Here’s How It Works

Shell companies, pseudonyms, shady lawyers, and secrecy: The president’s and his lawyer's business practices match the classic pattern of suspicious activity.

www.wired.com

Chapter 1 - The Moscow Project

Donald Trump may not have any business in Russia, but Russia certainly has business in Donald Trump.

themoscowproject.org

Providing links is reaaaly hard especially when it's simply a google sentence away fro proving you, a pathological liar, wrong.

It's even harder when the links don't exist. "You're literally only mad because I dismantled everything you stand for."

Search: trump illegal ties to Russia money

That's exactly what I searched for.

 

[JazzyFresh]

Sort of, in that the unverified Russian intelligence to which he is referring seems to be anonymous, at least to us.



You can't verified an unverified report by pointing to information in that unverified report.



"You're literally only mad because I dismantled everything you stand for."



Mueller went through and verified many things about it in his report.



Like all good intelligence chiefs, Brennan likely provide some information that was unverified, as well as some that was verified. This bit may of been among it. It's still unverified information, and likely Russian propaganda.



Four of the first 5 links (one was behind a paywall. Some of them said there could have been illegal contributions, none of them said there were illegal contributions. A couple said what was legal is bad enough.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/trumps-businesses-are-full-of-dirty-russian-money-the-scandal-is-thats-legal/2019/03/29/11b812da-5171-11e9-88a1-ed346f0ec94f_story.html

Following the Money: Trump and Russia-Linked Transactions From the Campaign to the Presidential Inauguration

At the heart of the inquiry into the alleged collusion between Trump and Russia is money. It provides concrete evidence of relationships, methods, and motives.

www.americanprogress.org

If Trump Is Laundering Russian Money, Here’s How It Works

Shell companies, pseudonyms, shady lawyers, and secrecy: The president’s and his lawyer's business practices match the classic pattern of suspicious activity.

www.wired.com

Chapter 1 - The Moscow Project

Donald Trump may not have any business in Russia, but Russia certainly has business in Donald Trump.

themoscowproject.org

It's even harder when the links don't exist. "You're literally only mad because I dismantled everything you stand for."



That's exactly what I searched for.

This is stupid. What a waste of your(and my) time just to basically say that you can't prove a single thing you just simply disagree.

 

[One Brow]

This is stupid. What a waste of your(and my) time just to basically say that you can't prove a single thing you just simply disagree.

I provided exactly the proof you requested, and I'm not surprised you dismissed it. That's why it's not worth the bother, most of the time.

 

[JazzyFresh]

I provided exactly the proof you requested, and I'm not surprised you dismissed it. That's why it's not worth the bother, most of the time.

No you didn't. Your responses are just awful lol.