Lol
I would strongly prefer to to not live in a world where aging up pre-teen girls is normal. So, I don't think it's OK.
So, there have been over 30M cases and 600K deaths, and you see this as some sort of vindication?
Pretty decent. Part of the reason bat-corona viruses were being studied there is because that region produces a lot of bat-corona viruses.
Because he understands the difference between possible and probable. It's possible Venusian aliens created the virus to infect humans, but it's pretty unlikely.
Fauci doesn't have the type of money to fund that research, and the US did not fund that research.
Fauci said one was coming, but did not specify a time frame.
Animal-to-human transmission has been the primary vector for these diseases for eons. It's amazing anyone is stupid enough to think that has somehow changed.
Astronomically unlikely things happen every day.
I just don't hear Biden "hitting on" that girl in that video. You're repetition that he is doesn't make it true. If you hear that, I think you have a problem of some sort.
My money is now on venusian aliens.
You don't approve if it? Wonder why... If he did nothing wrong than... Uhh...
Well when you all promised 75,000,000 by now and spent weeks telling me how wrong I was, even though it was literally 1st grade math, it should be pointed out how little basic schooling y'all possess.
In a preprint study published Friday titled “Recovery of deleted deep sequencing data sheds more light on the early Wuhan SARS-CoV-2 epidemic,” Professor Jesse Bloom, a virologist from the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, explained that he discovered a data set of 45 positive samples from Wuhan outpatients with suspected COVID-19 early in the epidemic that was “deleted from the NIH’s Sequence Read Archive.”
Perhaps you don't understand this for some reason, but it's quite possible to do something wrong without there being a sexual intent behind the act. Perhaps you have some sort of weird fetish?
No one promised any such thing. We were discussing possibilities absent protective measures (measures such as staying at home and wearing masks).
I used to, but it was just a waste of time. I would pull in articles for you to read, and you would go back to repeating the same stuff anyhow, without any read you read that to which I linked. If I ever see an indication that you will read, understand, and acknowledge such information, I'll start including it again.
I agree. You are not wrong because I say you are wrong. You are wrong for entirely different reasons, that have nothing to do with me.
I don't see why I need to subscribe to your definition of "man". Also, if there is actual proof (a rare thing indeed in the real world, where instead we mostly find evidence), then aren't they truths?
Lol a post full of lies.
If you recall, and you may not, these varying figures were based on models. The model that came up with 75,000,000 was from the Imperial College study, which I posted( remember? You relentlessly, meaning nearly every day, accused me of fear mongering because I posted scientific papers in the coronavirus threads) and which estimated the number of cases based on various models. Whenever you have raged about that particular figure of 75 million, you always leave the modeling out. Part of your dishonest approach to the subject. That high figure was based on the assumption that no efforts at mitigation or containment would take place. In other words, the figure was based on the model that assumed nothing would be done, simply allow the virus to run its course unchecked.
www.npr.org
www.healthdata.org
Coincidence that jazzfresh comes back and the fall apart at the same time? I think not
I explained the basic math to every single one of you down to the simplest terms and you all argued I didn't understand exponential growth or how stupid I was for using 2nd grade law of averages. It was common damn sense. Then... You all deny it. You make up post like this claiming something different yet you all argued for literal months with me about it. If what you are saying is true then why did you argue against me for that much time? My ONLY(ONLY) argument was that 75,000,000 were not going to get sick. Nothing less nothing more.If you recall, and you may not, these varying figures were based on models. The model that came up with 75,000,000 was from the Imperial College study, which I posted( remember? You relentlessly, meaning nearly every day, accused me of fear mongering because I posted scientific papers in the coronavirus threads) and which estimated the number of cases based on various models. Whenever you have raged about that particular figure of 75 million, you always leave the modeling out. Part of your dishonest approach to the subject. That high figure was based on the assumption that no efforts at mitigation or containment would take place. In other words, the figure was based on the model that assumed nothing would be done, simply allow the virus to run its course unchecked.
Also, there MAY be an undercount of deaths. Try not to let this go up your arse sideways.
New Study Estimates More Than 900,000 People Have Died Of COVID-19 In U.S.
The total, estimated by researchers at the University of Washington, is 57% higher than the official death toll. Worldwide, they said, COVID-19 deaths are nearing 7 million, twice the official total.
Estimation of total and excess mortality due to COVID-19 | Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation
Our updated modeling strategy now estimates total COVID-19 mortality, including unreported deaths due to COVID-19.
I made up this post? On the contrary, its the same points I used repeatedly to explain it to you in the past. I just explained it again, in the very post you claim is something different than what I told you at the time. No it’s not. I outlined the models the Imperial College study outlined, and their estimates for each. I also not once called you stupid. But you saying I did is just you playing aggrieved victim. Which is your style.
www.deseret.com
I still need an explanation for this "not that I approve of what Biden did". If he wasn't hitting on a 10 year old child what do you disapprove of? You don't approve because you know what he did was flat out wrong. If he was just being nice there would be nothing to disapprove. You're admitting he did something wrong. You're admitting he hit on a little girl.
