What's new

Coronavirus

I think that's an excuse that anti-vaxxers fall back on; an excuse with no reason, no warrant, just pure fear-mongering.
4q27uu.jpg
 
I think that's an excuse that anti-vaxxers fall back on; an excuse with no reason, no warrant, just pure fear-mongering. The reason we need two injections in the first place is because the mRNA breaks down before a full immune response can be generated after one shot. The only persistent effect is antibody readiness.

You’ve missed the point. And I am pro vaccine but I’m going to choose one with the vector method not an mRNA one. It’s not fearmongering to say there hasn’t been a long term study on any possible long term side effects because .. well .. there hasn’t been.

Repeat read “long term”. take it in. Not short term.
 
You’ve missed the point. And I am pro vaccine but I’m going to choose one with the vector method not an mRNA one. It’s not fearmongering to say there hasn’t been a long term study on any possible long term side effects because .. well .. there hasn’t been.

Repeat read “long term”. take it in. Not short term.
fair response. However i would ask those who use this reason to not get vaccinated if they research everything that they put into their bodies to make sure that long term testing has been done or if its just vaccines that they have this requirement for.
 
fair response. However i would ask those who use this reason to not get vaccinated if they research everything that they put into their bodies to make sure that long term testing has been done or if its just vaccines that they have this requirement for.
Same. I think most people go to the doctor and whatever they write a prescription for they take. I know that's not everyone, and I'm going to get a whole bunch of "I research everything I put in my body" responses even when that's not true.

Sent from my SM-G973U using JazzFanz mobile app
 
fair response. However i would ask those who use this reason to not get vaccinated if they research everything that they put into their bodies to make sure that long term testing has been done or if its just vaccines that they have this requirement for.

yup agreed The amount of patients i see who have no earthly idea of what drugs they're on or what they're for is nuts
 
I got my microchip implant separate from my first vaccine dose. Didn't everyone?
 
You’ve missed the point. And I am pro vaccine but I’m going to choose one with the vector method not an mRNA one. It’s not fearmongering to say there hasn’t been a long term study on any possible long term side effects because .. well .. there hasn’t been.

Repeat read “long term”. take it in. Not short term.
It's fear mongering when you use it as a reason to not vaccinate, but since you are merely getting a different vaccine, you do you.
 
I doubled up on microchips. If I fall down a well I want Bill Gates to be able to rescue me.
I think the double-chip option just gives him the ability to turn you off.
 
I doubled up on microchips. If I fall down a well I want Bill Gates to be able to rescue me.
Now when I make a mistake I can say Bill Gates made me do it.

For those concerned, mRNA vaccines have been tested in many forms going on a decade now, and there have been no reported side effects.

I honestly would have more concerns being injected with a modified monkey virus rather than a specific mRNA that triggers a response only to Covid-19's spike protein and nothing else and breaks down fairly fast.

All the vaccines are emergency authorized at this point. If you have concerns do some research and decide for yourself.

Covid side effects are much riskier than any of the U.S. approved vaccines.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top