What's new

The Non-Jazz NBA Thread in the Jazz Section

Lets find out if your bet is correct. Never know unless we try.



Sent from my iPad using JazzFanz mobile app
What would you base an AR-15 ban on? Just the name? Functional capability? Appearance? By model number?

When they release the all new RA-51 the day after the ban that slips through the new regulations while doing pretty much the same thing how do you stop it?
 
What would you base an AR-15 ban on? Just the name? Functional capability? Appearance? By model number?

When they release the all new RA-51 the day after the ban that slips through the new regulations while doing pretty much the same thing how do you stop it?
Length of barrel and semi-automatic status? Would that impact hunting weapons?
 
Length of barrel and semi-automatic status? Would that impact hunting weapons?
AR-15s are hunting weapons for many people. So it would impact those. It's not a preferable deer hunting rifle, but I've known people who use them for coyote hunting and varmint hunting.

There are already minimums on barrel length of a rifle.

I think overall minimum length, semi-automatic, detachable magazine would be a place to start as far as regulating current AR-15 and similar weapons, but then a day later there is a model that meets the min length, has a large internal magazine, and wouldn't you know it the gun industry has designed a weapon that doesn't classify as semi-automatic yet can be fired almost as fast.

Look to the last AWB and the way the industry and customers found ways around the regulations.

Let's keep in mind these are semi-automatic rifles with detachable magazines that are relatively short.

rsranch_071807b.jpg


Rugar-10-22-featured-photo.jpg


The one on the bottom shoots .22 cal rounds that are on the very low end as far as "power" is concerned, even compared to moat handguns. There is almost no way you could ban AR-15s and not ban that Ruger 10/22.
 
Lets find out if your bet is correct. Never know unless we try.



Sent from my iPad using JazzFanz mobile app
Well not every mass shooting involves an AR.


I think just betting on eliminating one gun rather than focusing on the bigger problems is short-sighted and a waste of resources.

Edit: what's kind of interesting is I've made that last point in almost every post I've made on this subject and it keeps getting left out of all responses. No one cares to address that part. They just want to stick to the "AR Bad" mantra and not get into what it will take and where else we can focus our efforts. I'm not defending gun ownership, but acknowledging the fact that there is limited resources and support for gun reform and focusing the lions share of the effort on a single method is shortsighted.
 
Last edited:
AR-15s are hunting weapons for many people. So it would impact those. It's not a preferable deer hunting rifle, but I've known people who use them for coyote hunting and varmint hunting.

There are already minimums on barrel length of a rifle.

I think overall minimum length, semi-automatic, detachable magazine would be a place to start as far as regulating current AR-15 and similar weapons, but then a day later there is a model that meets the min length, has a large internal magazine, and wouldn't you know it the gun industry has designed a weapon that doesn't classify as semi-automatic yet can be fired almost as fast.

Look to the last AWB and the way the industry and customers found ways around the regulations.

Let's keep in mind these are semi-automatic rifles with detachable magazines that are relatively short.

rsranch_071807b.jpg


Rugar-10-22-featured-photo.jpg


The one on the bottom shoots .22 cal rounds that are on the very low end as far as "power" is concerned, even compared to moat handguns. There is almost no way you could ban AR-15s and not ban that Ruger 10/22.
I have a similar one in 220 swift for coyote, rabbit, general varmint shooting at distance. And it's hella fun to take plinking.
 
What would you base an AR-15 ban on? Just the name? Functional capability? Appearance? By model number?

When they release the all new RA-51 the day after the ban that slips through the new regulations while doing pretty much the same thing how do you stop it?

Mostly appearance. If it looks like a gun that would be popular in the call of duty games then lets try to keep then out of the general publics hands


Sent from my iPad using JazzFanz mobile app
 
AR-15s are hunting weapons for many people. So it would impact those. It's not a preferable deer hunting rifle, but I've known people who use them for coyote hunting and varmint hunting.

There are already minimums on barrel length of a rifle.

I think overall minimum length, semi-automatic, detachable magazine would be a place to start as far as regulating current AR-15 and similar weapons, but then a day later there is a model that meets the min length, has a large internal magazine, and wouldn't you know it the gun industry has designed a weapon that doesn't classify as semi-automatic yet can be fired almost as fast.

Look to the last AWB and the way the industry and customers found ways around the regulations.

Let's keep in mind these are semi-automatic rifles with detachable magazines that are relatively short.

rsranch_071807b.jpg


Rugar-10-22-featured-photo.jpg


The one on the bottom shoots .22 cal rounds that are on the very low end as far as "power" is concerned, even compared to moat handguns. There is almost no way you could ban AR-15s and not ban that Ruger 10/22.

Those guns dont look like they would be popular in call of duty games so they are ok.


Sent from my iPad using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Steph starts game one 4-5 for 14 pts, five minutes left in the first quarter. Legend.
 
Lakers looked good last night... either that or Phoenix looked ******. Austin Reaves was dropping dimes. He might really be the player everyone though THT was.
 
Top