The matrix is with reference to decisions this off-season. I'm mostly in the "keep both" camp. The reference to losing later by keeping both is that you're getting much less a return by waiting for Donovan to ask out. He's gone regardless unless we win two titles and you can't walk away from it, so it's just a question of how much you can get for him. I think you get 90 cents on the dollar now and significantly diminished returns later. I'm totally fine with taking that risk, keeping both, and getting a good coach while cleaning up the roster (even if that's as simple as moving out Conley and Royce and filling those spots with guys like Juancho and House [not necessarily those specific guys filling that role, but just saying opening up more time for two way guys]). I'd like to maximize what we have now and really go for it. I think most people are down from seeing our poor results which I think are artificially depressed as a result of taking an approach that looks at basketball on paper and completely neglects psychology. A new coach could inject that to what we've got. The Celtics turned it around and I know everyone would appeal to "lol they've got all the right tools," but if they continued the trajectory they were on and totally flamed out, nobody right now would be sitting here talking about the Celtics and saying "OMG they've got all the right tools!!1"Why would the Jazz lose later if they both stayed? They're complimentary "star"
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk