What's new

Trade Rumors Involving the Jazz

People think tanks last a decade… what leads teams to being ****** for 10 years is not tanking when it’s obviously something they should do. Absorb the process fully and you will be good in 2-3 years if you have some luck… 3-4 years if you aren’t particularly lucky… maybe less.
You just have to hit on an actual star as we saw with Atlanta (Trae), Dallas (Luka), and Memphis (Most ant).
 
People think tanks last a decade… what leads teams to being ****** for 10 years is not tanking when it’s obviously something they should do. Absorb the process fully and you will be good in 2-3 years if you have some luck… 3-4 years if you aren’t particularly lucky… maybe less.

The only team who tanked and got lucky and is competing after 3 years is Memphis. Everyone else is heading for the 4-5 year model like I’ve been saying. Nobody has said a decade but you can end up there with some bad decisions.
 
So he’s never had a real #2 scorer. Don, bogey, and Clarkson were our only 3 dudes that could score with any sort of consistency.
Most teams, even contenders,
are lucky to have three consistent scorers. The Jazz had four with Clarkson, an all-time efficient finisher that puts up 15-ish in Gobert, and a resulting elite offense. This notion that Mitchell had no help on offense is absolute fiction. It’s an embarrassing take.
 
The only team who tanked and got lucky and is competing after 3 years is Memphis. Everyone else is heading for the 4-5 year model like I’ve been saying. Nobody has said a decade but you can end up there with some bad decisions.
The bad decisions are being impatient.
 
Most teams, even contenders,
are lucky to have three consistent scorers. The Jazz had four with Clarkson, an all-time efficient finisher that puts up 15-ish in Gobert, and a resulting elite offense. This notion that Mitchell had no help on offense is absolute fiction. It’s an embarrassing take.
Rudy gobert was a consistent scorer?
 
Back
Top