What's new
By:

Jazz and Knicks discussing Donovan Mitchell trade per Shams Charania and Tony Jones

What could the Jazz get for RJ if they eyeing sending him elsewhere? Particularly in terms of unprotected picks. Would Charlotte send two?
 
Handlogten's Heros said:
I also think we get in a trap thinking if we don't help LA then no one else will... someone will benefit... we have a great offer. We should just go ahead and benefit even if it mean helping the Lakers.
Click to expand...
Look I am all for giving up our vets for those future picks. What I won't do is take assets from other trades an pile those in as well, especially young players from the Knicks. I just don't think the Lakers are going to give up 2 unprotected picks or the Pacers would already have them. What people are really considering is giving up the farm for 1 future pick. Sure we got Hayward on a pick 10 years later, but we only gave up a Googs on a peg leg. If they want Conley and Bojan fine. I'm not sure Clarkson would want to go back though so he's off the table.
 
nateboz said:
6 picks. No Barrett. Seems like the deal is still what utah wanted all along.

Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
It seems like Leon made an ultimatum that Utah did not comply with. Leon thinks he’s in control here.

The consequences must be severe. All 8 FRPs and all the younguns, or we trade him somewhere else.
 
The reactions from Knicks fans to a scenario of not getting Donovan and paying that money to Barrett may be real gold (even better when december comes)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top