What's new

Players that could be had for Memo TPE

Probably the most interesting name on the list you provided was Hedo. Not because I would want him or his contract anywhere near this team, but we all know whoever wants Dwight has to take back Hedo. And for all you who will no doubt clamor that why would we want Dwight for a 1 yr rental, well I'd rent him for a year and give up Al, CJ + GS pick to do it. I'd even throw in a Burks or a Hayward as well.
 
In short, with the $10.8 million TPE, the Jazz can absorb ONE contract at that money or less.

I thought you may be able to combine TPEs for a single player making less than the combined total. I knew you couldn't combine a TPE with a player for another player... ok. all makes sense. thanks.
 
Probably the most interesting name on the list you provided was Hedo. Not because I would want him or his contract anywhere near this team, but we all know whoever wants Dwight has to take back Hedo. And for all you who will no doubt clamor that why would we want Dwight for a 1 yr rental, well I'd rent him for a year and give up Al, CJ + GS pick to do it. I'd even throw in a Burks or a Hayward as well.

crazy talk
 
This is how the old CBA operated and I really doubt it has changed.

No way to know what has changed and what hasn't unless you try to read up on it. I accidently deleted the link I posted, but here it is again. Rather than speculate on what might or might not be true, I try to read up on CBA stuff. I know GVC does the same, which is why I wanted to know if he knew something I had missed.

https://webfiles.uci.edu/lcoon/cbafaq/salarycap.htm#Q72

In some cases, teams have up to one year to acquire the replacement player(s) to complete a trade. These trades are considered non-simultaneous trades. In a non-simultaneous trade, a team can only acquire up to 100% plus $100,000 of the salary it gives up (as opposed to 125% plus $100,000 in a simultaneous trade). A trade in which more than one player is traded away can only be simultaneous; non-simultaneous trades are allowed only when a single player is traded away (although teams can sometimes find ways to configure multi-player trades as multiple single-player trades which are non-simultaneous).
 
Back in 07, I knew the CBA pretty well, but I've forgotten nearly everything since then.
 
Probably the most interesting name on the list you provided was Hedo. Not because I would want him or his contract anywhere near this team, but we all know whoever wants Dwight has to take back Hedo. And for all you who will no doubt clamor that why would we want Dwight for a 1 yr rental, well I'd rent him for a year and give up Al, CJ + GS pick to do it. I'd even throw in a Burks or a Hayward as well.

Basketball-wise, it's a no-brainer. However, do you think the Jazz are going to pay ~$34 million over three years to probably just rent another guy? I don't. Especially since Dwight's play demands floor-spacing, which the Jazz have almost 0 of.

Interesting thought, nonetheless. Especially since in the rental scenario, Dwight doesn't have to sign off on it.
 
You can use a single TPE on multiple players, actually (if Larry Coon's FAQ is to be believed).

Holy ****.

This seems new. Maybably not.

It was described on the radio, from a conversation with KOC, and yes it can be used on multiple players.
It can be used in quite a few ways.
KOC called it the equivalent of a gift card, or something like that.

If it's like that, it could prove very useful.
 
You cannot combine the salary from one TPE to any other salary. That includes other players and other TPEs.

TPEs are tricky when it comes to understanding all the possibilities of how they can be used. From what I've read, it's true that you can't combine exceptions, but not necessarily true that you can't combine them with another player. I think a lot depends on the specific circumstances of each particular trade.

https://webfiles.uci.edu/lcoon/cbafaq/salarycap.htm#Q72


Here is a more complicated example of a legal non-simultaneous trade: a team has a $4 million Traded Player exception from an earlier trade, and a $10 million player it currently wants to trade. Another team has three players making $4 million, $5 million and $7 million, and the teams want to do a three-for-one trade with these players. This is legal -- the $5 million and $7 million players together make less than the 125% plus $100,000 allowed for the $10 million player ($12,600,000), and the $4 million player exactly fits within the $4 million Traded Player exception. So the $4 million player actually completes the previous trade, leaving the two teams trading a $10 million player for a $5 million and a $7 million player. From the other team's perspective it's all just one big simultaneous trade: their $4 million, $5 million and $7 million players for the $10 million player.

Again, it's possible I'm missing something, as there is a lot of information on TPEs.
 
I just skimmed this thread but......
Why hasn't anyone mentioned Wes Matthews in this conversation?
I remember C.J. Miles playing so much better when they were playing side by side in the playoffs against the Lakers.
I say get a 3 team deal going to get Matthews back in a Jazz uniform. Portland is in massive need of a big man.
Jefferson anyone?

Sent from my DROID3 using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top