I'm sure you remember it that way. Scared little white men have such delicate feelings.
Actually, it was the non-parents at the meeting who were making threats that the DoJ was concerned about.
I much as I dislike @The Thriller 's balck-and-white mentality, he has never called for civil war, and certainly not in the post before Red's. Identification is not support. That's your fear talking.
First, I did not read the comment by Thriller. Second, having now gone back and read it, I don’t believe he was PROMOTING a civil war, but observing that we are presently involved in a “soft civil war”. Do you believe that’s the same thing as saying, “yay, a civil war, let’s go, yeah, let’s do it!”. Because that would be PROMOTING a civil war. I might in fact agree with him about a “soft civil war”. Certainly the culture wars have a “civil war” feel to it. DeSantis seems to be focused on the culture wars in his campaign for the Republican nomination. So yeah, we really are at one another’s throats on many cultural issues.
By that measure, neither was Fox News promoting civil war. I personally believe we should lower the temperature a bit. Both the take of Fox News and The Thriller are bordering on the ridiculous. I don't like Joe Biden, but he isn't a dictator. I disagree strongly with the mentality of many still supporting Donald Trump, but I take issue with the incredibly broad brush The Thriller is using to tar people with the ugliest parts of his imagination. My comment was intended to bring focus to Red and The Thriller being pots calling the kettle black. That is an observation I stand behind. Those two are every bit the material they lampoon but on the other side, and neither seem to express any self awareness.
I'd say it was Fox News identifying characteristics in Biden that are congruent with the characteristics of dictators. They didn't say that he was a dictator, only that he was a wannabe dictator. However I think you took it a step further all on your own. Fox News didn't seem to be promoting an overthrow of the government with their observation. You read that in all on your own. You are seeing what you want to see, and what you want to see seems to be the same thing you are condemning Fox News for wanting to see. I feel that you are shouting at your own reflection.
I see a sizable distinction in their posting (Red is much more reasonable and measured), but otherwise agree.
That is fair. Red and The Thriller are different. One is clearly far more angry and unreasonable. I actually quite like Red's take on things usually as he does put thought into what he says.
I bet you hold this same energy when black people are selectively prosecuted and convicted at higher rates in addition to being handed comparatively harsher punishments for the same crime.
You'd lose that bet. It is worth noting that disparity has greatly evaporated over the past decade. Nearly all of the race hustlers still pushing that narrative point to statistics from decades ago.
I did lose. You definitely don't hold the same energy. I guess AI only gets noisy when Republicans are held accountable(a little bit).
I've never seen blood of that color, that's the backdrop, and I don't see any threats.The cameras that were there also seem to remember it that way. It was quite a look.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing...-continued-battle-for-the-soul-of-the-nation/
nypost.com
Conservatives still collectively losing their minds about this is the best thing to come out of the whole "Dark Brandon" bit.The cameras that were there also seem to remember it that way. It was quite a look.
LOL. I didn't notice until you posted that link that even Biden referred to that speech as a call to "battle" against Americans he disagreed with politically.
Not sure why, but dictators of the type that like to kill or jail their political opponents do seem to have a fondness for adorning their regimes with those colors.
That's been the rhetoric all over the place recently, but frankly that kind of hyperbole simple IS politics. I mean look at the hyperbole on both sides. You know, Biden call for a battle for the basic rights in our country to apply to everyone, Donald encourages a full-on terroristic insurrection to illegally steal a free and fair election. I mean it's basically the same thing, right?
I agree that calling for battle, war, fighting, etc. are common among politicians but those calls take on a more ominous tone when you use the military as prop in your call to battle against other Americans.
Do you have any evidence to support that you’re engaging with these trolls is encouraging them to think more skeptically?
I know, kind of like using the military to force protestors to move so you can get a photo op with an upside-down Bible. I mean who does that?
