I think he would be a great fit for either LA team, especially if he can make them a cellar-dweller. Let the man talk!I dont know how you guys generally feel about different basketball analysts but I'm starting to think Yossi Gozlan is one of the worst.
He listed 5 teams that make sense for Lavine and those were: Magic, Pistons, Hornets, Mavs and Lakers.
I mean wtf is that? Magic makes some remote sense since they dont have bucket getters and have a great defense, but the timeline is wrong. Pistons and Hornets make even less sense as they dont look like win now teams at all. Mavs are probably the second worst fit in the entire NBA (behind Clippers) for Lavine, and the proposed Lakers trade package (Rui, Prince, DLo) would send them back to 3P shooting stone age which made them a cellar dweller once before.
Timeline isn't a real thing for most teamsI dont know how you guys generally feel about different basketball analysts but I'm starting to think Yossi Gozlan is one of the worst.
He listed 5 teams that make sense for Lavine and those were: Magic, Pistons, Hornets, Mavs and Lakers.
I mean wtf is that? Magic makes some remote sense since they dont have bucket getters and have a great defense, but the timeline is wrong. Pistons and Hornets make even less sense as they dont look like win now teams at all. Mavs are probably the second worst fit in the entire NBA (behind Clippers) for Lavine, and the proposed Lakers trade package (Rui, Prince, DLo) would send them back to 3P shooting stone age which made them a cellar dweller once before.
You mean they dont care or that they dont have a core that dictates it?Timeline isn't a real thing for most teams
Multiple-Capitalizationability.Your post raises an interesting question:
Why not target LaVine AND DeRozan in a move? Bolerjack can maybe give us some data on success when playing multiple guys with multiple capitalizations in their names.
FIFY to harness more powerability.Multiple-CapitaliZationAbility.
Shoot me.
I’m sure he’s better than he’s showing this year and likely not super motivated. It’s just his on/off numbers for his whole career suggest strongly that he’s not a positive player. Even if he’s a talented and efficient scorer… it’s not leading to winning.I have seen a lot of Lavine games as a follower of Lauri´s career. I don´t know whether its a system Bulls have built around him or just himself, but somehow Bulls are killing natural flow of the game, especially when he´s on the court and seen as this new born MJ. I think that is big reason why several of the players who have gotten out of there, have been quite a bit different players elsewhere. Of course Lavine is extremely talented scorer, but there are definitely also cons with him. If Hardy isn´t real magician, I would expect adding him would make team worse, not better.