he needs a haircut. that long floppy hair is sapping his manhood or something. maybe if he just looked more fearsome he'd play more fearsome?
He's becoming one of the best passers on the team. Not exactly what I want to see.
Watching the game I thought he was far less aggressive than he should have been. He had a couple chances to get easier shots but instead faded from the basket and missed. He avoided contact like the plague as evidenced by his 0 ft attempts. He also blew a wide open layup when he could have dunked it and missed a 3 when he should have passed to a wide open raja on the baseline, among other things. Overall a poor performance, i'm sure he'll be pissed at himself when he looks at the film. A learning experience for a 2nd year player.
He is having his sophomore year of college all over again.
His sophomore year he was asked to do more ball handling and play-making and his shooting suffered greatly.
he needs a haircut. that long floppy hair is sapping his manhood or something. maybe if he just looked more fearsome he'd play more fearsome?
Well, I hope he gets as good as AK, although they are very different players, I don't see the comparison, but AK was an allstar, wasn't he?
You know, CJ had a monster game at the end of his first year too. We have to accept that Hayward might not be what we all thought he was. Both CJ and Hayward were thought of as good passers and pure shooters when the Jazz drafted them. Larry insisted that CJ was a future star in the league. It's pretty clear now that CJ won't be, at least not on the Jazz anyhow. If Hayward becomes CJ, I wouldn't accept it as a success, but how are they different? Attitude? They both are kinda goofy cheerful players, and lately hasn't it been said that Hayward is lacking the nasty? Isn't that CJ's problem? Mentally not focused?
Hayward better get his game together or he's going to get passed up by Howard, which really bites for the rebuilding process.