Well, I'm certainly hoping I'm wrong.Lol. You’re basing this off of what DA precedence?
Well, I'm certainly hoping I'm wrong.Lol. You’re basing this off of what DA precedence?
SF kinda sucks right now. Especially for families.Silicon Valley Tech Boom happened. It might not be LA/Miami, but it's probably in the running for third most appealing city for NBA players.
Is Kuminga more valuable than "untradable" Barrett? Or "untradable"(read - "traded 3 times in a year") Grimes?I'll take the firsts. Kuminga is interesting but nah... he's still to theoretical to me.
We used to visit every summer. It always had its issues but they have gotten worse.Does that change the weather? San Francisco/Oakland is slightly miserable, IMO. State taxes are also extremely high.
All’s I’m saying is that with a salary cap (and salary floor), being a willing spender is the difference between good and great, not bad and good.
Kuminga is the equivalent of like... Sexton or Lauri in the Mitchell trade. Meaning... good things to have as salaries coming your way... but don't fool yourself that you won't need to give up tons of picks too...
I'll take the firsts. Kuminga is interesting but nah... he's still to theoretical to me.
I’m not pondering if it’s worth it but I think that’s the type of deal that would need to happen to get it done.Kuminga has wayyyy higher value than Sexton/Lauri at the time they were traded imo.
I think it’s ok to say, “we’d rather have the picks than Kuminga”….but we’re not getting everything.
That’s fine…I’m just saying that if he was in the deal, he would substitute for a heavy chunk of draft capital. People listing out every single GSW asset and still pondering if it’s worth it would not like the deal that may happen.
NBA players seem to like it.SF kinda sucks right now. Especially for families.
If he’s such a nice/valuable player, why wouldn’t they just want to keep Kuminga if they’re going all in for a championship? Seems in the interest of all parties that he stays in GSW and the Jazz get better draft capital.Kuminga has wayyyy higher value than Sexton/Lauri at the time they were traded imo.
I think it’s ok to say, “we’d rather have the picks than Kuminga”….but we’re not getting everything.
That’s fine…I’m just saying that if he was in the deal, he would substitute for a heavy chunk of draft capital. People listing out every single GSW asset and still pondering if it’s worth it would not like the deal that may happen.
If he’s such a nice/valuable player, why wouldn’t they just want to keep Kuminga if they’re going all in for a championship? Seems in the interest of all parties that he stays in GSW and the Jazz get better draft capital.