SaltyDawg
Well-Known Member
Like i said in my other post..... my military trained brother in law said that the way the man is carrying his rifle is unsafe and not the correct way to carry a gun.
So you say that if you see the guy carrying the gun on his back then it doesn't concern you, but a man carrying the gun in his hands does concern you.
Well my brother in law might get concerned by the man carrying the gun on his back, and think that the man carrying the gun in his hands is much safer.
See some people would see this man as a threat, and some people would not see him as a threat.... which is why i think the best thing to do would be to just not carry rifles into malls.
If you are worried about your safety when you go to buy shoes at jc penneys then i think you should just carry a 9 milli, a .45, a .357 ect.
From what I'm gathering, your brother in law is comparing how you are supposed to carry a gun during a war, to this guy who is walking around in a mall.
I don't think your brother in law would think the guy is a threat just because his rifle is on his back. He'd probably think he wasn't trained for combat, or he isn't carrying it properly for combat. That doesn't mean he's a threat.