LA Cop Killer

[fishonjazz]

I'm not rooting for him at all I hope he gets killed soon, but reading his manifesto if any of it is even a little true I can see why he is peeved. But all in all **** him and i hope he dies.

This

Tried to rep but couldn't

 

[Duck Rodgers]

It was typical job complaining, there wasn't anything out of the ordinary in his rants when talking specifically about his day-to-day job related problems. Somebody said a bad word in the police van....blah, blah, blah. Somebody on the force is a little power happy....blah....blah...blah. Somebody on the force is a little overly aggressive....blah blah blah. Even the police force here had worse public problems for years than he is complaining about. Maybe he needed a blog. I don't know why any of you guys are sympathizing with him. If he's LAPD, he could have left and got a job almost anywhere in the police field quite easily at the first point of issues. That's what he should have done.

 

[George]

It was typical job complaining, there wasn't anything out of the ordinary in his rants when talking specifically about his day-to-day job related problems. I don't know why any of you guys are sympathizing with him. If he's LAPD, he could have left and got a job almost anywhere else easily at the first point of issues. That's what he should of done.

I feel like working at the LAPD is much different than mere 'day-to-day' jobs, largely due to the mass amount of power and responsibility that their police force has.


Myself being inept at an office job might simply bog down the efficiency of the company I work for.


Police brutality is a much different beast altogether.


This scenario is much different than someone leaving because his manager always steals from the company.


I am mourning the losses of the civilians, but closely monitoring the response of the LAPD (so far, it has not been great).


Perhaps you should as well.

-George

 

[babe]

I feel like working at the LAPD is much different than mere 'day-to-day' jobs, largely due to the mass amount of power and responsibility that their police force has.


Myself being inept at an office job might simply bog down the efficiency of the company I work for.


Police brutality is a much different beast altogether.


This scenario is much different than someone leaving because his manager always steals from the company.


I am mourning the losses of the civilians, but closely monitoring the response of the LAPD (so far, it has not been great).


Perhaps you should as well.

-George

well, I understand. I know doing drugs or taking prescribed stuff like SSRIs and SRIs can do a number on anybody. Not the same danger though, between an insurance salesman who is just unable to return calls from clients. . . . ., say. . . . . , and a police officer on the big career high with a tight-knit cadre of "supporters" playing up to you like sycophants play up to dictators. . . . ..

this officer on his shooting spree gets no sympathy from me, even if everything he says is not only true, but vastly understated. Given he has begun the killing spree that's been reported, anyone who knows where he is and is not telling the police authorities, however corrupt they may be, is aiding and abetting a homicidal maniac.

Do the right thing. Turn him in, and call for the death penalty.

Once he's off the streets, call for reforms in police management.

 

[fallenchicken]

This is nuts! Like the plot of a bad paperback. I hope nobody else gets killed.

 

[bigb]

Do the right thing. Turn him in, and call for the death penalty.

This thing's not going to trial. It will end in a shootout where he either takes his own life, or is killed by the cops/FBI.

 

[bigb]

https://www.foxnews.com/us/interact...-officer-christopher-jordan-dorner-manifesto/

That is a link to the Dorner's "manifesto.

Edit: Sweet God...

I got about a page and a half into it before I couldn't stand it anymore. Dude obviously has serious mental issue, regardless if what he's saying is true.

 

[Shaggy]

He's nuts, for sure. But if the LAPD is just firing away at innocent people with no warning (multiple times now), maybe this nutjob has a point.

And the media acts like that is no big thing.

 

[asian_roger]

People get fired unfairly all the time. Maybe LAPD is corrupt, but there no justification whatsoever to kill a former police chief's daughter, her fiance, and cops that have nothing to do with this. I can't believe people are defending his actions. The people commenting on CNN really really hate cops. Its pretty sad.

 

[Gameface]

People get fired unfairly all the time. Maybe LAPD is corrupt, but there no justification whatsoever to kill a former police chief's daughter, her fiance, and cops that have nothing to do with this. I can't believe people are defending his actions. The people commenting on CNN really really hate cops. Its pretty sad.

I personally believe the divide between the public and the police force is a result of America's current civil war, also known as the war on drugs. It literally forces tens of millions of people to live in fear of the police even though they are only engaging in voluntary trade. Millions are in prison for what is essentially no different than political prisoners in dictatorships, they disagree with a current policy banning recreational drug use. The war on drugs has been used to almost eliminate the 4th and 8th Amendment when it comes to enforcing a prohibition on an individuals right to posses a substance that they will never use to hurt anyone else by force.

It's a problem. In my opinion it's the biggest problem the U.S. faces. Yet it seems a good chunk of the country feels so strongly about their right to tell others how to live that 1% of our population in prison, police violation of our basic rights, and the police state of our inner-cities is just the price we have to pay to force people to act as we want them to.

Hey, let's argue about gun rights so we can forget about a person's right to their own body and mind. I mean, there are Bill of Rights issues here too, but I guess only some of our constitutional rights are really important.

 

[babe]

I personally believe the divide between the public and the police force is a result of America's current civil war, also known as the war on drugs. It literally forces tens of millions of people to live in fear of the police even though they are only engaging in voluntary trade. Millions are in prison for what is essentially no different than political prisoners in dictatorships, they disagree with a current policy banning recreational drug use. The war on drugs has been used to almost eliminate the 4th and 8th Amendment when it comes to enforcing a prohibition on an individuals right to posses a substance that they will never use to hurt anyone else by force.

It's a problem. In my opinion it's the biggest problem the U.S. faces. Yet it seems a good chunk of the country feels so strongly about their right to tell others how to live that 1% of our population in prison, police violation of our basic rights, and the police state of our inner-cities is just the price we have to pay to force people to act as we want them to.

Hey, let's argue about gun rights so we can forget about a person's right to their own body and mind. I mean, there are Bill of Rights issues here too, but I guess only some of our constitutional rights are really important.

I take it you just don't understand how important it is for cartels to keep the supply of their goods restricted so their prices can be exorbitant, nor do you understand just how long the drug cartels have been running the world. Well, before we were a nation, we had merchants joining in with the British opium trade. It was a great international corporation called the British Far East Trading Company. First they had agents beating the bushes of Africa to round up some cheap labor, and packed their empty holds for the run to the Americas for sale, where they picked up sugar, rum, cotton, furs and lumber for the run to England, where they provided the raw materials for the sweatshop factories of Liverpool. Then, loaded with cotton cloth products they sailed to India where they undersold local cotton growers and weavers, and with the help of military occupation troops forced the Indian cotton growers to grow opium, instead. In India they loaded up with opium and sailed for China, where with gunboat "diplomacy" they forced the Chinese to allow them to offload their drugs for the supply of the opium dens, and picked up tea and silk. And on back through Singapore to pick up spices and tin perhaps. . . . but everywhere they went, the left cats and drug addicts.

George Bush's ancestors were involved in the opium trade, and many of our largest and most influential banks have through all time facilitated the drug cartels by accepting deposits from them, and furnishing them cover for their business.

The war on Hemp began with the invention of nylon, and the urgent necessity of outlawing competitive rope materials.

But the place where the drug legalization folks lose my sympathy is in not recognizing that the use of drugs and other products of practically no necessary utility and significant negative health impacts, like is the case with alcohol, tobacco, and many pharmaceuticals, is something we can well afford to dispense with. The end of the British Slave Trade was accomplished with a neat slogan "No Sugar For My Tea", and "No Tea, please." and exposing the persons whose wealth was derived from the slave trade.

I agree there is no constitutional authority for the government to regulate the materials we trade or the use we make of them, but take it one step further and refuse to patronize the damned cartels, OK.

 

[Gameface]

I take it you just don't understand how important it is for cartels to keep the supply of their goods restricted so their prices can be exorbitant, nor do you understand just how long the drug cartels have been running the world. Well, before we were a nation, we had merchants joining in with the British opium trade. It was a great international corporation called the British Far East Trading Company. First they had agents beating the bushes of Africa to round up some cheap labor, and packed their empty holds for the run to the Americas for sale, where they picked up sugar, rum, cotton, furs and lumber for the run to England, where they provided the raw materials for the sweatshop factories of Liverpool. Then, loaded with cotton cloth products they sailed to India where they undersold local cotton growers and weavers, and with the help of military occupation troops forced the Indian cotton growers to grow opium, instead. In India they loaded up with opium and sailed for China, where with gunboat "diplomacy" they forced the Chinese to allow them to offload their drugs for the supply of the opium dens, and picked up tea and silk. And on back through Singapore to pick up spices and tin perhaps. . . . but everywhere they went, the left cats and drug addicts.

George Bush's ancestors were involved in the opium trade, and many of our largest and most influential banks have through all time facilitated the drug cartels by accepting deposits from them, and furnishing them cover for their business.

The war on Hemp began with the invention of nylon, and the urgent necessity of outlawing competitive rope materials.

But the place where the drug legalization folks lose my sympathy is in not recognizing that the use of drugs and other products of practically no necessary utility and significant negative health impacts, like is the case with alcohol, tobacco, and many pharmaceuticals, is something we can well afford to dispense with. The end of the British Slave Trade was accomplished with a neat slogan "No Sugar For My Tea", and "No Tea, please." and exposing the persons whose wealth was derived from the slave trade.

I agree there is no constitutional authority for the government to regulate the materials we trade or the use we make of them, but take it one step further and refuse to patronize the damned cartels, OK.

As far as I know I'm not supporting any drug cartels.

BTW none of what I said was intended to indicate that I support this guy who's killing cops and anyone who has any connection to cops. I would definitely prefer he be captured alive, but beyond that I don't support him at all.