I follow ya...
I believe in God. I have my own set of reasons, and I feel like I "know" whether or not He exists.
I think my statement had more to do with the futility of arguing about the ability to prove the existence of God. It has not been proven, one way or the other. Knowing and being able to prove are completely different things.
In the few thousand years that we have been acquiring knowledge, we have discovered some pretty incredible things. But what we know is just a drop in the bucket. We understand the basic principles of science, but there is so much that is merely theory at this point. We have a very narrow perspective, and so trying to prove God within the parameters that we have is impossible. It makes me think of Monty Python and the Holy Grail, when they are trying to decide whether or not the woman is a witch. Eventually they decide that if she weighs the same as a duck, she's a witch. The logic is comical, but illustrates how mankind's ability to reason has increased as their knowledge has increased. We're still comparing woman and ducks, figuratively speaking. One day maybe we'll get there.
This is why faith is such an important aspect of the God question.
I have a fairly accurate hunch generator. I can't explain how I know my kids are fooling me about something, but every time I check it out I find out they are.
It is just a little disconcerting, that sometimes I "just know" a lot of things. . . .. .with no data or evidence or even a coherent hypothesis. I wake up on a summer morning, and for no reason I know it's gonna rain 'bout sundown. Lots of thing go unnoticed consciously but are still processed in our brains. . . like humidity and heat. . . . . makes me think "rain" without actually consciously processing the data. . . .
I would lay out the religious hypothesis in the same way. I think if people want to "lean in" to it, there are a lot of things besides what's just obvious in the physical context. People who believe in God don't seem to "need" science to do it.