What's new

Porn (no links allowed obviously)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Actually, that's not what I was talking about, but it's my fault for not being clearer on the subject. I was referring to RCC doctrines that I find immoral, not the behaviors of individuals.

Oh, then I apologize for misreading your post. I have grown accustomed to people bringing up child abuse scandals.
 
I view fast-food work differently than you. I view it as an opportunity for unskilled workers to better become more qualified and move beyond the fast-food job.

Connery Bond's treatment of women is appalling btw

I don't disagree with what you said about fast-food restaurants, at least to a degree. I think both points are true.
 
I don't disagree with what you said about fast-food restaurants, at least to a degree. I think both points are true.

Indeed. It's difficult to discuss because people generalize and tend to overlook the fact that no two situations are similar
 
You could probably make an argument for objective truth, depending on how you define truth. I have never seen a successful argument that there is an objective morality, without presupposing many other questionable things.

We probably would need a lot more time and a lot more dialogue... I imagine that I am presupposing many things that you disagree with.
 
Just want to say I'm the only one who posted quality sources of said subject matter. The only reason I felt compelled to share them is that I actually feel they are of a higher quality and standard than most. They portray women as beautiful and sexual beings capable of giving and receiving pleasure.

I have my reservations about what leads a woman into the porn industry. It would certainly ruin it for me completely if I felt the woman was being coerced and victimized. I don't believe all porn does that. I'm sure that some does.

Your rep power is at 69 lulz
 
Sorry, I prefer my porn written to visual, and I've almost always been satisfied with alt.sex.stories.moderated or it's derivatives.

Since this can be stated in anonymity I'll provide an eerie example

I am not ashamed to say that books can be exciting. However, I feel unsure of myself after reading the book "Lolita"
While I am not sexual attracted to 9-14 year old girls, I found some of the passages to be semi-arousing.

Is this immoral?
 
Since this can be stated in anonymity I'll provide an eerie example

I am not ashamed to say that books can be exciting. However, I feel unsure of myself after reading the book "Lolita"
While I am not sexual attracted to 9-14 year old girls, I found some of the passages to be semi-arousing.

Is this immoral?

The Lolita of the title is not an actual person, and the writer, IIRC, is using a unreliable narrator to tell the story. So, I wouldn't be surprised if your reaction came from Humbert making Lolita sound like, look like, or react like an adult, as opposed to a child.
 
Sorry, I prefer my porn written to visual, and I've almost always been satisfied with alt.sex.stories.moderated or it's derivatives.

Sounds fun. Let me try...

I would start by massaging her delicate bottom, kneading her buns as I eye her little hole. Hopefully this would relax her muscles such that I could insert one digit (probably my middle finger, well lubricated with saliva) through her sphincter to feel the inner lining of her warm and tender ******. She would tighten involuntarily at the strange sensation of being penetrated this way, gasping in surprise and embarrassment, but as soon as she loosened I would jam my finger home, knuckle-deep in her beautiful backside. Then I'd withdraw just as quickly, give her rump a playful pat, and reach forward so she could suck my finger with ladylike propriety and grace.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top