lol at this nugget from Simmons under the Boston's section
They competed just about every night for Brad Stevens, blowing close game after close game because they didn’t have a crunch-time guy
This is extremely debatable. I could easily say that bigs in todays NBA don't matter at all. Heat have won the last two without one. Howard couldn't win a playoff series. etc.My board, assuming everyone is healthy:
Embiid. You can't beat a big. Duncan, Shaq, Kareem, Hakeem. If you have an elite big, you have titles.
Smart - I put him over the other bigs, because we need some nasty. His size and strength and athleticism is unheard of at the PG spot. He will be much better than he is getting credit for.
This is extremely debatable. I could easily say that bigs in todays NBA don't matter at all. Heat have won the last two without one. Howard couldn't win a playoff series. etc.
The 4 players you mentioned are all top 20 all time. Is that what Embiid would need to be?
I agree.IF Embiid's ceiling is Hakeem, then he is top 20 all time. And in this NBA, where there isn't Malone, Barkley, Shaq, etc and the "best" big out there is....Howard?...Embiid would dominate (if he is Hakeem). He would be Jordan level domination.
I agree that bigs are irrelevant in the league today, but I'd argue that it's because there aren't any Hall of Fame level bigs in the NBA today.
So, you put Hakeem in today's NBA...unstoppable.
I agree.
But how likely is it that he ever makes it to his ceiling?
Eh. That's why I take Wiggins #1 after strongly, strongly, strongly considering Parker.