GVC
Well-Known Member
1. I stuck with this year's cap figure to be as conservative as possible. If the cap goes up, the Jazz only have more cap space to work with.GVC, I don't think $58mm will be the number in 13-14 but could be wrong. From what I've read, 4% raises to the BRI calc. should be in. Do you think they aren't for some reason?
Also, meeting the minimum wage is as easy is calling Ostertag up for a max one year deal. I think at minimum Jazz could take a terrible expiring along with a first and a young gamble to meet the minimum. They would still have the cap room you're looking at. That's scary room with The Four (HT Numberica), and why I think a guy like Howard should take a damn hard look.
2. The minimum I was talking about was the roster size minimum (there's a charge equal to the minimum salary for a 1st year player charged to a team's cap for every player fewer than 12 they have under contract). The Jazz can renounce cap holds of their own free agents when they're ready to sign a free agent. Again, I'm being conservative here, and using the highest possible number for the Jazz salary (assuming the Jazz renounce all their own free agents).