What's new
By:

2020 Free Agency Thread

KqWIN said:


Jazz mentioned here. Between GR3 and Batum interest, looks like the Jazz are going to try to fill the last spot with a real player.
Click to expand...

Nah... we gonna roll with 13... be under the tax... say we want the two way guys to play because there is no g league season. I wouldn’t sign these guys if it means being over the tax.
 
Handlogten's Heros said:
Nah... we gonna roll with 13... be under the tax... say we want the two way guys to play because there is no g league season. I wouldn’t sign these guys if it means being over the tax.
Click to expand...
Just an FYI... the next 7 years we are -4 in second round picks. Not the end of the worl but when we want to trade for a vet on an expiring we aren’t going to have the capital to do it. Also if we want to dump a contract we gonna be strapped. If they plan on buying them every draft night great... but using one to dump like 300-400k of guaranteed salary is kinda silly... we got some cash in the deal so that’s great... for Ryan. We should just ****ing trade Mike and get all the way out of the tax... I think we are barely in it by a millionish or so.
 
NUMBERICA said:
This organization is run by clowns.
Click to expand...
I agree with this but to say it over the Rayjon Tucker moves, thats taking it too far.... I think ppl become a bit too attatched to players Utah's just 'taking a flyer on' (fringe guys) and Tucker would qualify for that..
 
KqWIN said:


Jazz mentioned here. Between GR3 and Batum interest, looks like the Jazz are going to try to fill the last spot with a real player.
Click to expand...

Well if its those 4 teams.... I'd imagine the Kings are the high bidders and the playoff squads are trying to get him to take the minimum...
 
Handlogten's Heros said:
Just an FYI... the next 7 years we are -4 in second round picks. Not the end of the worl but when we want to trade for a vet on an expiring we aren’t going to have the capital to do it. Also if we want to dump a contract we gonna be strapped. If they plan on buying them every draft night great... but using one to dump like 300-400k of guaranteed salary is kinda silly... we got some cash in the deal so that’s great... for Ryan. We should just ****ing trade Mike and get all the way out of the tax... I think we are barely in it by a millionish or so.
Click to expand...
Yes we should trade Mike....
 
Lord Bullingdon said:
I agree with this but to say it over the Rayjon Tucker moves, thats taking it too far.... I think ppl become a bit too attatched to players Utah's just 'taking a flyer on' (fringe guys) and Tucker would qualify for that..
Click to expand...
No one is to attached to Tucker they are foolishly bothered by giving away marginal assets such as second round picks. People need to realize the jazz can acquire 2end rounders whenever they want so who gives a **** if they use these picks to dump $, and they have a deep history of acquiring seconds.
 
Bodhi said:
Yes we should trade Mike....
Click to expand...
I wouldn’t hate a trade of Mike, but I’m not sure the jazz would get the value we would expect. He might be more valuable being on this team. With all the money that will be put on the books with DM, and Rudy extensions they may see Conley as more valuable having that money come of the books. I’m not any kind of cap guru, so tell me if this is wrong. I’m thinking how the jazz org may be thinking.
 
Thee Idiotic Minivan K said:
I wouldn’t hate a trade of Mike, but I’m not sure the jazz would get the value we would expect. He might be more valuable being on this team. With all the money that will be put on the books with DM, and Rudy extensions they may see Conley as more valuable having that money come of the books. I’m not any kind of cap guru, so tell me if this is wrong. I’m thinking how the jazz org may be thinking.
Click to expand...
Either am I but I’m almost certain that when Mike expires we will still be over the cap and will just have exceptions to spend like we would anyway. We aren’t opening up $35m in cap space.
 
I just wish the Jazz would trade Mike to a team where he's a better fit. It would be good for both parties. How they do that though seems to be the problem. Will they get back equal value. Highly unlikely, but in my opinion it's addition by subtraction to trade him for assets and maybe a good role player that fits the Jazz's needs.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top