This. 100 times.
Also, homosexuality is a huge anchor on anyone’s campaign. For all the focus that Harris’s campaign received for being a black woman, it’s interesting how little attention mayor Pete’s electability is receiving. IMHO, being a black woman is a smaller obstacle to overcome than being a married gay man. Although, I haven’t conducted nor seen any Recent polling on this. I’m just going with history. Yet we never hear about how Pete’s homosexuality plays among key demographics like blacks, high school educated whites, and suburban women.
My take:
1. Is Pete talented and intelligent person? Yes.
2. Does he have a future in politics? Probably.
3. Does he have the credentials to be president? He’s one of the least qualified and least experienced candidates out there. Biden was a Senator and VP. Booker, Harris, Klobachar, Sanders, and Warren are all senators. Several others have been representatives and governors. Pete was a mayor of a tiny town.
4. Is he mostly an opportunist attempting to scoop up moderates from Biden? What’s his vision for the future? No clue. He seems to be merely an opportunist who’s trying to scoop up Biden’s supporters if/when he drops out.
IMHO, Booker and Klobachar are better moderates and are much more electable. Klobachar might actually be a top 2-3 politician yet for whatever reason doesn’t get the attention that she deserves. It’s too bad, I really like her. I wish she could catch fire. Klobachar with a young likable VP candidate who appeals to minorities would be an unstoppable ticket.
Team Klobachar with Stacey Abrams (she seems busy in Georgia) or Andrew Gilliam and you’re looking at a landslide election for Dems. Klobachar brings back the upper Midwest. Dems win both coasts. VP candidate brings out enough minorities to win a few western/southern states, and Trump is routed like we were against Philly.