2020 Presidential election

[One Brow]

... take us down the path of Venezulean socialism.

None of the Democratic candidates are going past Scandinavian socialism.

 

[Heathme]

 

[Safetydan]

Well at least she is good looking. Did you see the post where some think Elizabeth Warren is good looking. LOL If they were to see my wife they would think she was Miss Universe then.

LOL, she wouldn't **** you either.

Come on, lets see it. Pics or GTFO

 

[Zombie]

None of the Democratic candidates are going past Scandinavian socialism.

It's been weird seeing posters who decry "far left socialist Dems" rally behind Tulsi Gabbard. Like, have they looked at her platform?

 

[Heathme]

 

[Ferguson_Mellochill]

There's some truth to this. Immigrants who get hooked on welfare and other social programs normally vote for Democrats who push those programs. It becomes something of a partnership that helps Democrats gain votes.

 

[Heathme]

 

[Jazzta]

Is anyone else secretly thinking what a $1000 income increase would look like?

 

[silesian]

I'm no fan of the way things have been going over the last 20 years, but there is no way in hell you're going to .Republicans, Independents, and Libertarians who think the Constitution of the United States is a great document, that socialism is the way to go...Its not gonna happen and you'll be handing Trump another 4 years.

I'm a stark raving limited government capitalist.

Democratic economic ideas are bad policy, they are not categorically unconstitutional.

The framing of "socialism" (i.e., medicare, social security, EPA, FDA, free college, etc.) versus "constitution" is a false choice. The Constitution defines the power for who make laws, interprets them and executes them. As long as those players are acting within the constitutional framework, they can vote to spend us into debt until we are completely broke. Stupid yes, unconstitutional, no.

We have a huge and growing out of control central Government today, thanks to both parties thirst for power. This is an awful state, but is it unconstitutional?

Do I want someone who makes Government significantly smaller? you bet. You need a competent person to do this. Trump? please, this carnival barker can't mange his way out of a wet paper bag. He caved to Pelosi on the budget like a meek little boy and the budget that he PROMISED to balance in his first term has created 4 trillion of new debt, growing a trillion more each year. This is while the economy is GROWING. You people know how this ends, right? In recession with no tools to dig our way out. With loss of wealth from your kids, just so we can benefit today. We are selfish bastards, indeed.

Given the choice between a box of turds and trump, turds it is. And if there are sensible fiscal conservatives (do they exist?) out there to counter the liberal box of turds, I vote for them for checks and balances.

Trump's got to go.

 

[Heathme]

 

[Coach Ellis]

Tulsi Gabbard endorsed Bernie last time, so there should be no question where her priorities are.

With that said, she doesn’t sound crazy and impossible to work with like some candidates AND she’s a veteran.

Service is a huge factor in my support, and I like her better than Pete.

Doesn’t mean it’s the end all be all. I thought McCain was a douche and I didn’t vote for him even though he was probably closer to me in belief than Obama was.

 

[fishonjazz]

Tulsi Gabbard endorsed Bernie last time, so there should be no question where her priorities are.

With that said, she doesn’t sound crazy and impossible to work with like some candidates AND she’s a veteran.

Service is a huge factor in my support, and I like her better than Pete.

Doesn’t mean it’s the end all be all. I thought McCain was a douche and I didn’t vote for him even though he was probably closer to me in belief than Obama was.

Did Trump serve?

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app