Do you not think that Yang would be a better president than Trump? I just don’t think that your point is all that relevant. Give me someone that doesn’t make an *** out of himself and brings real tangible changes for the people.
I don’t know whether he would or wouldn’t be.
What I do know is that expertise matters. Don’t you think it wise to elect someone to the highest level of government who has maybe just a little bit of experience in government?
Don’t you think there’s a reason so few people without experience in politics or the military have been elected to the office of President?
Would we hire someone to coach the jazz who had no experience coaching or playing in the NBA? Why?
Would you trust just anyone to perform a surgery on you? Or would you seek a professional?
Why shouldn’t the office of president be any different?
Expertise matters. If Yang wants to try politics, let’s see him do it as local politics. If he shows he’s competent there, try state politics. Then try national.
Why are we rushing to give the least knowledgeable and least experienced the ability to kill billions of people? To lead our justice department and law enforcement? To be the most influential member of our society? Why? To me, expertise is extremely relevant.
I think this is indicative of the larger problem we have in our society; the devaluation of knowledge and expertise. You’d think people like
@Jazzta would understand the value of this after seeing trump. But then again,
@Jazzta is
naive enough to deny Russia’s attack on us in 2016. So I need to keep that in mind in considering the sources of someone who clearly doesn’t value knowledge or expertise.