voting for Trump this time around. I know that is not popular on here, but I think he has done a fabulous job during this crisis. I think he will help rebuild the economy. I've spent a lot of time the last two weeks reading everything I could get my hands on from both sides of the isle and I believe he will be the better choice this time around. I know many feel he has done more than poor when it comes to this crisis. I just vehemently disagree. Won't argue... everyone has their opinion.
Still wish we had someone in the D party that could compete. Biden has lost 5 steps, he's a mess. I know... Putting on flack jacket now. I'm good with it.
voting for Trump this time around. I know that is not popular on here, but I think he has done a fabulous job during this crisis. I think he will help rebuild the economy. I've spent a lot of time the last two weeks reading everything I could get my hands on from both sides of the isle and I believe he will be the better choice this time around. I know many feel he has done more than poor when it comes to this crisis. I just vehemently disagree. Won't argue... everyone has their opinion.
Still wish we had someone in the D party that could compete. Biden has lost 5 steps, he's a mess. I know... Putting on flack jacket now. I'm good with it.
Much different than it is now. The perception of him now vs. then is huge, as is McCain and George W. Bush. Public perception and politics is all about recency bias. Mitt was perceived as a rich, white male who cared little for anyone but those like him. A stark contrast to current interpretations of integrity and honor. Because of his fairly squeaky clean past, stories about his depravity included putting the dog cage on top of the car in the 1980s and possibly saying the F word to a volunteer at the 2002 Winter Olympics. Also google “binders full of women,” because that was a pretty big thing.What was the general consensus on Romney back then? I was in HS and didn’t know anything about politics or really care for that matter.
I feel pretty much the same about him now as I did then.Much different than it is now. The perception of him now vs. then is huge, as is McCain and George W. Bush. Public perception and politics is all about recency bias. Mitt was perceived as a rich, white male who cared little for anyone but those like him. A stark contrast to current interpretations of integrity and honor. Because of his fairly squeaky clean past, stories about his depravity included putting the dog cage on top of the car in the 1980s and possibly saying the F word to a volunteer at the 2002 Winter Olympics. Also google “binders full of women,” because that was a pretty big thing.
Actually, it appears to have its own Wikipedia page.
But it does depend because “general consensus” is polarized. In short, Romney was much more beloved by the right, and much more despised by the left, whereas now that’s flipped. But it’s kind of like if you were to go back to 2008 and see the general consensus of W Bush and then fast forward over 10 years and seeing him dancing on Ellen.
Mitt was perceived as a rich, white male who cared little for anyone but those like him. A stark contrast to current interpretations of integrity and honor.
Because I wasn’t speaking to traits as much as I was speaking to the question of how he was perceived.Why do you see those traits as contrasting, as opposed to coexisting?
Because I wasn’t speaking to traits as much as I was speaking to the question of how he was perceived.