NAOS
Well-Known Member
I fully agree with what you're saying here, especially about high school and about the state of most kids as they enter college. I still think revamping of the general Ed requirements would be beneficial. Even if it can't be tied directly to a major, I feel like there is improvement that can be made there. Like you said, appreciation of Cinema, if taught correctly, can expand someone's Outlook, but I really wonder how often it is taught correctly. Are there universal standards around the country to ensure that a class like this is taught correctly? Do we even really have a good grasp of what teaching a class like this correctly would look like? I know when I took it the professor more or less said, go watch this movie and write a review like you would see in the paper. Then when we turned it in he would return it to us telling us where we were wrong because we disagreed with him. And having some discussions with friends about this and other gen Ed classes, including my daughter who is in college right now, their experiences were largely the same. So yes I absolutely agree students need some breadth in their Early college education, but there are definitely improvements to be made there.
But on the topic of high school, we have found it largely to be a cumbersome joke. My youngest daughter just graduated as the class of 2020, and for much of her High School experience she felt exactly as you expressed it. I don't feel anything in her classes did a good job of preparing her for college or any kind of Life after High School. Our education system in general has a lot of improving to do to catch up with many of the countries leading the pack.
I definitely think there are improvements that can be made. The biggest problems to overcome are (a) the size of institutions, (b) their business-like objectives around growing the size of the student bodies (undergrad through post-doc)—rather than something that is more concretely merit-based and supported from matriculation through post-graduate hiring, and (c) turning themselves into R&D farms for local corporations. These three things, in particular, make it hard to monitor and care about so-called “fringe” classes or “remedial education” (I’d strike both terms from the mouths of any university).
I wouldn’t argue for universal standards. I’d make sure that the leadership of the University has the institution pointed toward the right objectives, and that the teachers were being paid a living wage. We’re failing pretty wildly on both accounts at most universities.
Last edited: