I'd rather have that salary amount split among two contracts.Wow. That surprises me. I'm not sure what the downside is except that JVV might help us win more games than we want?
I'd rather have that salary amount split among two contracts.Wow. That surprises me. I'm not sure what the downside is except that JVV might help us win more games than we want?
Why?I'd rather have that salary amount split among two contracts.
Why?
Maybe you aren't understanding that FVV has a club option next year. We would be trading for an expiring contract if we wanted to treat it that way. Trading away the JCs for an expiring contract is the best we can hope for in my opinion.
It's not that serious because no way Houston does it, but also because this isn't about a long term thing, just the rest of this year. If we want to move on from him at the end of the season then we do and now have max level cap space.Do Jazz really want another undersized PG?
Do they want someone who may drop them out of a couple top 5 picks over next two years?
Do they want someone who may not be the missing piece?
If that's the plan they cannot let him play one minute for JazzIt's not that serious because no way Houston does it, but also because this isn't about a long term thing, just the rest of this year. If we want to move on from him at the end of the season then we do and now have max level cap space.
Yeah, I understand. It's still a no. You are still dealing Hendricks for this deal.Why?
Maybe you aren't understanding that FVV has a club option next year. We would be trading for an expiring contract if we wanted to treat it that way. Trading away the JCs for an expiring contract is the best we can hope for in my opinion.
If that's the plan they cannot let him play one minute for Jazz
They can't risk having him win one game for Jazz
What? Now I don't understand, what does Hendricks have to do with anything?Yeah, I understand. It's still a no. You are still dealing Hendricks for this deal.
oh, nvm, thought Hendricks was in the trade.What? Now I don't understand, what does Hendricks have to do with anything?
I'm just talking about straight up the JCs for FVV.
I agree with Cy. If they want us to take that contract we need more than Cam Whitmore.No, not really.
I agree with Cy. If they want us to take that contract we need more than Cam Whitmore.
FVV is massively overpaid of course, but he's a free agent after the season, so we'll clear a lot of money for next year.are you saying it makes no sense to value john collins and Clarkson plus their contracts more than FVV and his massive 42 million dollar contract. what has FVV done to justify that contract? I like Cam Whitmore, but FVV's contract is a massive negative asset.
But why do they need to clear money? I honestly think we are getting one more year of tanking.FVV is massively overpaid of course, but he's a free agent after the season, so we'll clear a lot of money for next year.
Yeah, that may be the case, just pointing out (to oldtimer) that the contract isn't much of a problem. Clearing money next year would potentially allow us to for example save someone from tax hell by picking up an expiring plus assets.But why do they need to clear money? I honestly think we are getting one more year of tanking.
Not for Houston. They got Green, Eason, Smith Jr , Tate, Amen and Brooks. Thats wings and forwards for days. Also I bet they dont want JC to be a 25M tweener backup center to Sengun, who plays 30+ mpg.are you saying it makes no sense to value john collins and Clarkson plus their contracts more than FVV and his massive 42 million dollar contract. what has FVV done to justify that contract? I like Cam Whitmore, but FVV's contract is a massive negative asset.