What's new

2024 NBA Draft Mega Thread

If Sarr/Clingan/Risacher go top 3 I could see us trading up for Shep at 4. It would get him ahead of his most likely backstops (DET/CHO). If the Jazz take Shep at 4, the Spurs can be reasonably be confident that their PG will be there at #8.

DET
CHO
POR

These teams are not taking Topic/Dillingham.
 
If Sarr/Clingan/Risacher go top 3 I could see us trading up for Shep at 4. It would get him ahead of his most likely backstops (DET/CHO). If the Jazz take Shep at 4, the Spurs can be reasonably be confident that their PG will be there at #8.

DET
CHO
POR

These teams are not taking Topic/Dillingham.

What do you think the Jazz would need to offer the Spurs in order to move up from #10 to #4? And why would the Spurs (who are looking for a PGOTF) trade back with the Jazz when they have their choice of Topic, Dillingham or Sheppard at #4? I think the scenario you're describing is highly unlikely.

Also, fwiw, I think it's unlikely that the Jazz would draft Sheppard over Topic.
 
What do you think the Jazz would need to offer the Spurs in order to move up from #10 to #4? And why would the Spurs (who are looking for a PGOTF) trade back with the Jazz when they have their choice of Topic, Dillingham or Sheppard at #4? I think the scenario you're describing is highly unlikely.

Also, fwiw, I think it's unlikely that the Jazz would draft Sheppard over Topic.
Because they think Topic falls to 8 or are comfortable taking Dillingham at 8?

Ferg, teams will trade back if they think they can get their guy at the trade back spot.
 
What do you think the Jazz would need to offer the Spurs in order to move up from #10 to #4? And why would the Spurs (who are looking for a PGOTF) trade back with the Jazz when they have their choice of Topic, Dillingham or Sheppard at #4? I think the scenario you're describing is highly unlikely.

I’m not good at trade value….but I’m saying it would be a reasonable move (whatever is fair) for the Spurs would likely still have that choice at #8 that they would have at #4.

In reality, most teams would just take the guy they want at #4, but if it’s Sarr/Clingan/Risacher/Shep top 4 who is going take Topic/Dillingham between 5-7?
 
Because they think Topic falls to 8 or are comfortable taking Dillingham at 8?

Ferg, teams will trade back if they think they can get their guy at the trade back spot.

* if they're 'dead certain' they can get their guy in a trade-back scenario.

You seem to think that Sheppard is higher on teams' big boards than Topic, Dillingham, Castle and Williams. That may or may not be the case. I'd predict that for a lot of teams it isn't.
 
I’m not good at trade value….but I’m saying it would be a reasonable move (whatever is fair) for the Spurs would likely still have that choice at #8 that they would have at #4.

In reality, most teams would just take the guy they want at #4, but if it’s Sarr/Clingan/Risacher/Shep top 4 who is going take Topic/Dillingham between 5-7?

Another way to look at Topic/Dillingham being there at #10. What is the scenario where they are both gone? It would have to be one of them going top 3….I suppose that is possible, but I actually think it is more likely that both are available at #10 versus neither.
 
* if they're 'dead certain' they can get their guy in a trade-back scenario.

You seem to think that Sheppard is higher on teams' big boards than Topic, Dillingham, Castle and Williams. That may or may not be the case. I'd predict that for a lot of teams it isn't.
I’d predict that is the case. Time will tell my friend. I think you’re really underrating Sheppard.
 
Another way to look at Topic/Dillingham being there at #10. What is the scenario where they are both gone? It would have to be one of them going top 3….I suppose that is possible, but I actually think it is more likely that both are available at #10 versus neither.
Topic at 2 to Washington is really the only scenario I see them both being gone.
 
Back
Top