What's new
By:

2026 NBA Trade Discussion Thread

Saint Cy of JFC said:
If the Jazz got #1 overall and Milwaukee/Giannis came to you and said Ace, #1, matching salary in the form of a Walker S&T and a first, and Giannis agreed to a long term extension, would you do it?
Click to expand...
Obviously.

But that wouldn't be enough for Giannis.
 
MTS said:
I'm just not the type of person that chooses the mystery box over the boat.
Click to expand...
I don't consider Ace, Kessler, or the number 1 pick in this draft to be all that mysterious.
 
fishonjazz said:
I don't consider Ace, Kessler, or the number 1 pick in this draft to be all that mysterious.
Click to expand...
The #1 pick is by far the most important piece in this trade. How on earth could you NOT consider it mysterious?

Most draft prospects hyped as "generational" don't end up being anywhere close to that.

You wouldn't trade Ace, Kessler, and, for example, 19 year old Andrew Wiggins, for Giannis?
 
MTS said:
The #1 pick is by far the most important piece in this trade. How on earth could you NOT consider it mysterious?

Most draft prospects hyped as "generational" don't end up being anywhere close to that.

You wouldn't trade Ace, Kessler, and, for example, 19 year old Andrew Wiggins, for Giannis?
Click to expand...
What you are suggesting is a repeat of the Mike Conley trade: trade away your promising young players, established vets and draft picks for an established star over 30.. Trades like that can pan out, but they can also backfire pretty badly. The aging star can suddenly get injured, waste one season and play out another just getting into shape and learning to play with a new team. And that what actually happened with Conley.

Giannis at 32 can get injured, waste a couple of seasons, finally have a semi-decent playoff run and then, feeling that he is wasting the very last productive years, demand a trade. The Jazz are a young team without playoff experience and, Giannis or not, they will need a couple of seasons of learning under the ideal conditions - Giannis will be 34 by then.

Of course, Giannis is Giannis, but having several promising young players on your team gives you infinitely more flexibility and time to figure something out. Mortgaging your promising youth and picks for a chance to have an aging superstar for 3 years is not a particularly good deal.
 
MTS said:
The #1 pick is by far the most important piece in this trade. How on earth could you NOT consider it mysterious?

Most draft prospects hyped as "generational" don't end up being anywhere close to that.

You wouldn't trade Ace, Kessler, and, for example, 19 year old Andrew Wiggins, for Giannis?
Click to expand...
If AJ and DP were in the same draft as Wiggins then Wiggins would have gone 3rd. AJ and DP are another level of prospect. People thought Wiggins was a generational talent in high school but college exposed his lack of ball in hand skillset a bit. AJ and DP look every bit the generational talent in college as they did in high school. I'm also interested to see why you don't think that offer would be enough for Giannis? No other team could come close to that offer.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top