Did you not watch him play after he got paid?
I understand his offensive drop off, boozer Deron, and Memo were all better options on offense but his drop off in blocks steals and overall defensive declined is inexcusable. AK pouted which caused him to play to not work hard, and caused bad feelings among the coaches and players.
Problem is AK blamed everyone but AK. It wasn't Sloans, or Derons, or Boozers fault AK play suffered.
It was AK's fault.
I think this is the biggest thing people fail to realize. Winners win. Sometimes, winners also lose. The difference is that the real winners actually possess insight into why they lose and are able to improve upon it. Those who advocate for AK on the team really underestimate the psychological and sociological aspects of basketball, which transcend talent. AK wants to win. But winning isn't AK's primary gratification. He wants to have fun. That's fine and dandy, but that's not what you try to work around if you're really trying build a contender. This is the divide on the board: some want to see AK be about winning, some want to see AK having fun, and the rest delude themselves into thinking you can have both.