Alex Jones and Social Media Censorship

[Harambe]

https://www.voanews.com/usa/report-fbi-doj-deprioritize-investigating-far-right-violence

Come on, man! He wouldn't have figured it out if you hadn't told him.

 

[Archie Moses]

Right, you don't care that they are fighting against a group that glorifies in physical violence, you just care that they are fighting.

I don't promote any group that glorifies violence just like I don't support any group that beats the **** out of a journalist. It's pretty simple, really.

I can draw lines as well. I don't support either side, but recognize the side that glorifies violence, and the reporters who support them (such as Ngo), are the bigger problem.

Apparently, you do draw a line and support one side.
In other words, you're saying that Ngo's journalism is more dangerous than a masked crowded gang beating him until his brain hemorrhages. Saying this does not mean you support Ngo, his journalism, or the far right. It's just commen sense.

I believe you have confused Heather Clark (a much less-publicized case, still OK despite a neck fracture) with Heather Heyer (who was killed, but not by a Proud Boy).

Yes, I confused the Heathers (especially since you brought up Ferguson.) What I don't understand is you saying, "I don't care when Heather had her cervical vertebrae broken? Like, what part from anything I've said lead you to make that conclusion? Is it the part where I don't like for group violence? I don't know many, saying "I don't care" is a POS move.

You're so caught up on you're either on Team Edward or Team Jacob.

 

[Archie Moses]

What do you think of the FBI and DOJ deprioritizing extremists?

I think that any group that is violent and politically motivated is a terrorist organization and should be a priority to be shut down.

I support the first amendment. People can say mean things without people reacting violently. Once any group starts enticing violence, or using violence to intimidate or suppress, they're a threat that needs to be shut down.

In other words, **** the far right terrorists, **** the far left terrorists and everyone terrorist in between.

 

[One Brow]

I don't promote any group that glorifies violence just like I don't support any group that beats the **** out of a journalist. It's pretty simple, really.

Yet, you only discuss the violence from one side, unless specifically prompted.

Apparently, you do draw a line and support one side.
In other words, you're saying that Ngo's journalism is more dangerous than a masked crowded gang beating him until his brain hemorrhages. Saying this does not mean you support Ngo, his journalism, or the far right. It's just commen sense.

Ngo does not seem to be an impartial reporter. He's a man with an agenda, who also does citizen reporting that aligns to that agenda, and deliberately put himself in the middle of the confrontation.

Yes, I confused the Heathers (especially since you brought up Ferguson.) What I don't understand is you saying, "I don't care when Heather had her cervical vertebrae broken? Like, what part from anything I've said lead you to make that conclusion? Is it the part where I don't like for group violence? I don't know many, saying "I don't care" is a POS move.

The part where your only focus is on less serious injuries done by Antifa, and not on more serious injuries by the Proud Boys.

You're so caught up on you're either on Team Edward or Team Jacob.

My only interest in this conflict has been responding to your one-sided presentation, and your attempt to use it as evidence of bias against the right. Look to the plank in your own eye.

 

[Gameface]

My take, reaction and opinion on the proud boys and Gavin (I don't even know who he really) pretty much mimics Joe's and Tim's in the YouTube clip I posted. Watch that and tell me if you have a problem with it.

I'm really not big on watching youtube videos. I can read the same info in a fraction of the time. Can you summarize what the video says?

 

[Archie Moses]

Yet, you only discuss the violence from one side, unless specifically prompted.



Ngo does not seem to be an impartial reporter. He's a man with an agenda, who also does citizen reporting that aligns to that agenda, and deliberately put himself in the middle of the confrontation.



The part where your only focus is on less serious injuries done by Antifa, and not on more serious injuries by the Proud Boys.



My only interest in this conflict has been responding to your one-sided presentation, and your attempt to use it as evidence of bias against the right. Look to the plank in your own eye.

I'm really not big on watching youtube videos. I can read the same info in a fraction of the time. Can you summarize what the video says?

The video does such a better job than what I could write. Basically, it gives context and covers how the Proud Boys started out as a joke on a talk show, to what it become now, and how, often times, it's start has been misrepresented. Tim hounds the Twitter lawyer with questions about Twitter's double standards and media bias. Joe and Tim condemn the bad and inexcusable things McInnes does and says.

I'm not sure if you listen to podcasts or not. I love Joe Rogan's podcasts. He'll has everyone from some if the smartest person in the world, to interesting people, to comedians, to actors, to whoever. If you haven't listened, I highly recommend. Joe Rogan, for the most part, is pretty level headed. There's a reason he has the number one podcast in the world.

If you get a chance, listen to that 10 minute clip and tell me if you think of it. I respect your opinion and viewpoint a lot on social issues like this.

 

[Stoked]

Yet, you only discuss the violence from one side, unless specifically prompted.



Ngo does not seem to be an impartial reporter. He's a man with an agenda, who also does citizen reporting that aligns to that agenda, and deliberately put himself in the middle of the confrontation.



The part where your only focus is on less serious injuries done by Antifa, and not on more serious injuries by the Proud Boys.



My only interest in this conflict has been responding to your one-sided presentation, and your attempt to use it as evidence of bias against the right. Look to the plank in your own eye.

The bolded sounds like victim blaming. His assault is not mitigated because the dude is an ******* who believes ******* things.

No, it’s not vehicular murder. But that guy rightfully got life in prison, didn’t he? I think saw that story recently on the news.

Shouldn’t these guys face assault charges?

I do think there is bias against the right on some sites and platforms. Just as there is bias against the left on others. People generally identify with one side more than the other and so the side biased against the side they most identify with seems magnified. Even when they can see the pieces of **** on their own “side”.

 

[Gameface]

The video does such a better job than what I could write. Basically, it gives context and covers how the Proud Boys started out as a joke on a talk show, to what it become now, and how, often times, it's start has been misrepresented. Tim hounds the Twitter lawyer with questions about Twitter's double standards and media bias. Joe and Tim condemn the bad and inexcusable things McInnes does and says.

I'm not sure if you listen to podcasts or not. I love Joe Rogan's podcasts. He'll has everyone from some if the smartest person in the world, to interesting people, to comedians, to actors, to whoever. If you haven't listened, I highly recommend. Joe Rogan, for the most part, is pretty level headed. There's a reason he has the number one podcast in the world.

If you get a chance, listen to that 10 minute clip and tell me if you think of it. I respect your opinion and viewpoint a lot on social issues like this.

Those kinds of jokes... they aren't jokes.

 

[Archie Moses]

Those kinds of jokes... they aren't jokes.

I don't know what you're referencing. Jokes?

 

[Harambe]

I don't know what you're referencing. Jokes?

Its the part where you were like "Boys started out as a joke on a talk show"

And I'll disagree... They still are a joke. A really bad one that's not funny. Jokes alone can be hurtful and damaging. The roots of Antifa(although inexcusable now) were created in response to a culture of hate. Proud boys are rooted in whining about people stealing the cookies their predecessors took.

 

[Archie Moses]

Yet, you only discuss the violence from one side, unless specifically prompted.

I brought this up in reference to censorship with Twitter. It was relevant to the discussion. Specifically with what Tim Pool referenced in the video I posted above. Just because I posted this, by no means does it translate to I'm only willing to discuss violence on one side.

I'm not only willing, but I condemn it on both sides, Mr I Suppose.

Ngo does not seem to be an impartial reporter. He's a man with an agenda, who also does citizen reporting that aligns to that agenda, and deliberately put himself in the middle of the confrontation.

I'm sure he has an agenda. I'm sure he's bias. I'm sure he's rubbed people wrong. None of that is grounds for having a group beat him until his brain hemorrhages and rob him.

That **** doesn't even have to be brought up. It should go without saying. Journalists need to be protected regardless of whether you agree with them.

The part where your only focus is on less serious injuries done by Antifa, and not on more serious injuries by the Proud Boys.

ONLY? WTF are you talking about? I posted one example to make a point on censorship. You brought up different scenarios, I've discussed, acknowledged, and and condemned.

I'm not a child and make dumb points like, "yeah, but Timmy did this."

You're the guy doing that.

And yet, I've still discussed them. I don't think you know what, "only" means.


Lol

"Only"

Gawd damn it.

My only interest in this conflict has been responding to your one-sided presentation, and your attempt to use it as evidence of bias against the right. Look to the plank in your own eye.

You're blind or can't read if you think I have a one sided presentation. Remember, you're the guy making the case of why Ngo was beaten. I'm the guy saying that's wrong. Heather Clark being injured is wrong.



All that being said, I Googled Heather Clark. Looks like she lead a protest and destroyed property during one protest. Just so I'm not missing anything, or have more clarity, I found the video of her beating knocked out. I saw her attacking a group of guys who were retreating/back peddling (she was the only one being physically violent at the time too) then the video pans away, and then she falls into frame after being hit.

I don't know everything that happened that lead up to that. I do know attacking a group of people isn't the smartest thing to do if you don't want retaliation.

Can you clarify how, in your opinion, she was attacked? I'm clearly missing something from the video evidence.


From what I understand, this is her destroying property and disrupting a discussion people she disagreed. In other words, she likes censorship. Lol

The irony

 

[Archie Moses]

Its the part where you were like "Boys started out as a joke on a talk show"

And I'll disagree.

So is Joe Rogan lying about that? How did it start then?

That said, if it did or didn't start out that way, it makes no difference to me. If the guy says ****** things, has a ****** following and is reckless, he sounds like a pos to me.