All gun control advocates please Report here!

[babe]

OK, now for a serious reply.

Though I like Bullets view on significant arms and his appreciation of the value of a populace competent with small arms, I believe Dutch understands Venezuela in seriously the right context. The Venezuelans had small arms( in lesser numbers I believe than the US, but the gun control law went into effect precisely because the government did not want to deal with that kind of static. I think it goes hard on the paid military to counter domestic civilian small arms, especially with bigger weapons.

So, yes, gun control is an objective of some authoritarian sorts of aspiring leaders with ideas about changing things. It would have cowed the government of Venezuela.

It would cow a Hillary or an Obama or a Trump with big ideas, too.

So I am absolutely in favor of 2nd Amendment, regardless of nuclear weapons or any Naval capacities. I'm in an Air Force exercise zone, and I get to see bombers and fighters at low altitude all the time, even missiles. The nice folks of the USAF, some significant-looking brass, came driving down my road to politely ask if they could take pictures so they could program their toys to miss me.

Hell yeah. But more importantly, it's knowing they respect the people that makes it all good.

 

[moevillini]

Mods once again, I struggle to see how LG's insulting posts contribute to the civil discussion outlined in the rules section of this website.

I've PMed you about this issue and have not received a response. Perhaps bringing this issue up publicly might entice someone to respond? I'm trying to figure out why these rules aren't being enforced consistently. Are some members treated differently because you agree with their political agenda? Some public clarification might be necessary! Thanks!

https://jazzfanz.com/faq.php

actually, we've been SWAMPED - with eliminating all sorts of profanity filter violations wherever they occur, it's a pretty draining process TBPHWY

and FWIW we have issued various warnings and infractions of which the general JF community has no knowledge since it's not apparent to anyone other than the recipient - unless you have the misfortune of receiving a third active inflation and others see your name appear in the "Tell us who got banned" thread

What do you take offense to here?

You're pretty ****ing horrible. You've attacked Log because you mistakenly assume he's a Trump supporter when he's not. Why shouldn't you get banned?

Dutch thinks he gets in trouble because he's a conservative and you think you get in trouble because you're a liberal.

Maybe you're both just douchbags?

most times, the personal attacks go both ways
and actually, I don't appreciate the name calling, even when (if?) it's not directed at me

 

[DutchJazzer]

actually, we've been SWAMPED - with eliminating all sorts of profanity filter violations wherever they occur, it's a pretty draining process TBPHWY

and FWIW we have issued various warnings and infractions of which the general JF community has no knowledge since it's not apparent to anyone other than the recipient - unless you have the misfortune of receiving a third active inflation and others see your name appear in the "Tell us who got banned" thread




most times, the personal attacks go both ways
and actually, I don't appreciate the name calling, even when (if?) it's not directed at me

i only got a warning recently for posting a pirated link! i am kinda amazed i havt gotten an infraction yet, it seems you guys loosened up. or did i mellow out

usually when i get an infraction it is for something i totally did not expect.(most of the time)

 

[moevillini]

i only got a warning recently for posting a pirated link! i am kinda amazed i havt gotten an infraction yet, it seems you guys loosened up. or did i mellow out

usually when i get an infraction it is for something i totally did not expect.(most of the time)

Look again Dutch.

told ya so...

 

[DutchJazzer]

Look again Dutch.

told ya so...

lol it was a TYPO! a typo that circumvented the profanity filter.

it is actually you guys fault, you should have the typos of profanity in profanity filter /s

 

[Boris]

YES HE WAS!

the germans also said ti taken the aminland will be har dand dangerous, it wont be easy to just subdue a whole town with 4 -8 armed soldiers!


in franc ethey litterlayy held towns occupied with just 4-8 soldiers!


seriously are u telling me i could come to America as a foreign power, take over Washington. and then proceed to hold population of certain suburbs etc with just 4-8 soldiers really you think that?


really! i just have to send 4-8 soldiers and 1 tank to every small town american town! lolz! i could take on 4 soldiers trying to hold a town on my own, if i have a just a simple handgun!
but you are telling me to occupy that town 4-8 soldiers is enough! hahahahahahahahahahaha who is ****ing dumb now!
ask any person who knows about combat and guerilla warfare how easy it is to take back your town and neighbouring towns if all they have is 4-8 soldiers an maybe a tank! go ahead tell me!


i know the left is banning and burning books elft and right maybe you should read some nazi books to see what held those ******** back!



i have talked to old guys who where young teenagers during the war in Holland Belgium and France! first hand accounts of how germans held massive cities and small towns! what they did to the local populace! how the populace was neutered because even if they could take down 1 soldier they wouldn't know how to use the soldiers gun! americans half of em atleast know how to use a gun! if their are 8 occupying sodliers in a town working in shift of 2-3 every 8 ghours it would be real easy to take em down and disarm them and turn their weapons on em if you know how to use em! read this from german books, and also local dutch/belgian books. also heard first hand accounts from old people my grnadfather in law lives in a town near the german border a small town near venlo! which was some of the few to get takenover, he has these old en over on poker nights and such and you hear the stories first hand about how a few soldiers held down the whole town, and they could do nothing openly. they did talk about stuff like stealing food from them. or this one time they horsenapped a german commander his horse and slaughtered the horse in someones basement for food! but no open Resistance!

problem is guns where stigmatized all along Europe average joes didn't know how to use em! trust me whenever i take people with me to the gun range for the first time they don't even know how it works! they don't know how a gun works how to use it and how to counter it!

they see this gun as a mighty powerful weapon they cannot wield, totally ignorant to it's effective range! they think they will get mowed down if they rise up and become greater than their cucked self

take another example remember a bunch of guys boarding a trian in amsterdam to paris, then they pulled out ak47 and thought they would race hell on the neutered people of europe. well they miscalculated their where a bucnh of marines, who know the rate of fire, and effective range of those ak47 and took those guys down! https://www.rt.com/news/313064-train-kalashnikov-shoot-paris/ only saved because those men understood guns did not fear them!


also i am not stupid to know that guns are not the only reason it is hard to conquer USA as a foreign power with just military manpower, even if a nuke would land on washington and 90% of federal politicians gone! america has a federal system and local governing system that would also have to be beaten. but the federal army would not be united to fight if certain strategic bases where to be hit!


so it is not stupid to say that guns in every hand stopped or prevented an invasion if there are other factors like governing system.


so don't call me dumb, because i have practical knowledge of close qtr combat and guerilla warfare! and knowledge of all kind of history straight from the horse his mouth(not much from japan but enough from netherlands, belgium and germany!)

Handgun? Bitch ya need to get a Barrett 50 cal an a ghillie suit. I could take out a hole platoon of them ******** before they knew where shots were coming from. I'd go Quigly Down Under on em an pop em off 2-3 at a time.

 

[Gameface]

Handgun? Bitch ya need to get a Barrett 50 cal an a ghillie suit. I could take out a hole platoon of them ******** before they knew where shots were coming from. I'd go Quigly Down Under on em an pop em off 2-3 at a time.

Did you know the Barrett 50cal is not intended as an anti-personnel weapon. If you wanna be a sniper there are far better options. I mean, unless you're talking about playing Call of Duty, which is probably what you're talking about.

 

[Boris]

Did you know the Barrett 50cal is not intended as an anti-personnel weapon. If you wanna be a sniper there are far better options. I mean, unless you're talking about playing Call of Duty, which is probably what you're talking about.

You wanna come over an test it out as a target? I can pull the .338 out after.

 

[Gameface]

You wanna come over an test it out as a target? I can pull the .338 out after.

Sure, here's how we'll do it. I get 30 min head start. I run several miles into the woods. You try to lug the 50 cal along as you chase me. If you do find me you'll be too exhausted to fire an accurate shot and I'll get away.

 

[Boris]

Most the longest recorded snipes are Barrett M82 or McMillan 50 cals. Better options my arse when are highly trained an technical military people prefer them. That's like telling a cop to pack a 22 pistol.

 

[DutchJazzer]

Did you know the Barrett 50cal is not intended as an anti-personnel weapon. If you wanna be a sniper there are far better options. I mean, unless you're talking about playing Call of Duty, which is probably what you're talking about.

finally we agree on something! they are usually deployed to stop vehicles right!

 

[DutchJazzer]

[video=youtube_share;FxwKpZ5gUjw]https://youtu.be/FxwKpZ5gUjw