D
Deleted member 848
Guest
The whole thing was wrong and stupidly built. Al Jefferson shouldn't have been our offensive focus. He should have been traded shortly after he arrived, or never traded for at all..
So it made zero sense to stall the growth of Burks in favor of banging our head against the wall continuing to try out the Al Jefferson experiment.
And that's your opinion-- but as long as we had Al Jefferson, Burks had no business being in the starting lineup. It's the way the cookie crumbles
And I'm of the opinion Burks was very good right from the start. He didn't just start being able to play. If he would have been given a real opportunity to settle in and get a lot of play time, he would have found some rhythm. Al Burks had to play with a different set of rules than Al Jefferson. Burks messes up on D one time and he is benched for the rest of the game. Al continually messes up on D and he is never benched. That is a bad message to send to your players and can only serve to screw with the psyche of a player like Burks. Burks is a much better shooter than he is made out to be. Burks had to play with constant pressure from the threat of being benched if he misses a shot. In short, he was over scrutinized and was handled wrong. Not a great way to develop one of your best talents.
Burks has clearly improved from his first year (we can agree to disagree here-- at worst we can say he hasn't regressed like Kanter) so clearly all of Ty's tactics didn't completely **** him up.
We can agree to disagree tho.