Burke-Burks-Hayward-Favors-Kanter?
- Thread starter gregbroncs
- Start date
![[size/HUGE] fixed [/size]](/data/avatars/m/2/2497.jpg?1511131091){kind=avatar}
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size]
Well-Known Member
Link? I'm tired of your trolling.
That's about right. Against the Pacers they played about 2 minutes in the first half, 2 minutes again in the 3rd quarter maybe, and IIRC they closed the last 4:29 of the game. I would have said 7-8 minutes, but it might be 9 like Locke said.
As for it not showing on 82games, I wondered about this during that game. If Burks checks in for Jefferson do they record him as the SF, since Hayward starts at SG? In another situation Burks could be the SG and Hayward the SF. With only 9 minutes played together they could have part of it recorded as Burke-Burks-Hayward-Favors-Kanter and part as Burke-Hayward-Burks-Favors-Kanter.
Come to think of it the same situation could exist with Kanter and Favors. I'm just not sure how 82games deals with that.
As for it not showing on 82games, I wondered about this during that game. If Burks checks in for Jefferson do they record him as the SF, since Hayward starts at SG? In another situation Burks could be the SG and Hayward the SF. With only 9 minutes played together they could have part of it recorded as Burke-Burks-Hayward-Favors-Kanter and part as Burke-Hayward-Burks-Favors-Kanter.
Come to think of it the same situation could exist with Kanter and Favors. I'm just not sure how 82games deals with that.
Never mind. If you go to the Jazz home page, you see that stats were last updated November 27. I thought they kept it more current than that.
https://www.82games.com/1314/1314UTA.HTM
https://www.82games.com/1314/1314UTA.HTM
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size]
Well-Known Member
The next thing someone on this god forsaken site is going to tell me is that Enes sprained is ankle right after Burke returned from his so-called injury.
Joe Bagadonuts
Well-Known Member
Good stuff NAOS, but what's your explanation for why they were never on the court together last night, especially since it immediately followed a game where that exact lineup played great together? Playing this lineup as much as possible should have been one of the most obvious goals this season.[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];717953 said:
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size]
Well-Known Member
My first explanation would include something about Enes' piss-poor play.
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size]
Well-Known Member
If I were coaching, I'd start Burks instead of Jefferson. But I'd also bring Enes off the bench until he appeared to give a damn about defense and boxing out.
gregbroncs
Well-Known Member
He's been back how long? Long enough that the lineup should have been used. Also what is the excuse for not ****ing using it against Portland?
gregbroncs
Well-Known Member
Thanks. I did not see that. I'm still disappointed that he is not using the lineup I most wanted to see in the off season enough. That should be either the starting or finishing lineup. I get than Kanter is being completely outplayed by Marvin. But this season is about developing chemistry and seeing what the young core has. We are not seeing that.
gregbroncs
Well-Known Member
So is the reason we saw that lineup so much against Indiana because once again injuries are a better coach than Corbin?