![[size/HUGE] fixed [/size]](/data/avatars/m/2/2497.jpg?1511131091){kind=avatar}
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size]
Well-Known Member
If I were coaching, I'd start Burks instead of Jefferson. But I'd also bring Enes off the bench until he appeared to give a damn about defense and boxing out.
Burke-Burks-Hayward-Favors-Kanter?
- Thread starter gregbroncs
- Start date
gregbroncs
Well-Known Member
He's been back how long? Long enough that the lineup should have been used. Also what is the excuse for not ****ing using it against Portland?
gregbroncs
Well-Known Member
Thanks. I did not see that. I'm still disappointed that he is not using the lineup I most wanted to see in the off season enough. That should be either the starting or finishing lineup. I get than Kanter is being completely outplayed by Marvin. But this season is about developing chemistry and seeing what the young core has. We are not seeing that.
gregbroncs
Well-Known Member
So is the reason we saw that lineup so much against Indiana because once again injuries are a better coach than Corbin?
Should be a goal of the season to have those play 30 mpg together. Let Marv and RJ play enough to be trade bait, let Rudy have 18 mpg. Other than that, the rest can rot on the bench.
fishonjazz
Well-Known Member
Contributor
2018 Award Winner
2019 Award Winner
2020-21 Award Winner
2022 Award Winner
2023 Award Winner
2024 Award Winner
Should be the starting lineup imo.
At least for a few games to see how it works..... If it don't work, what's the harm? Helps the tank if that starting lineup sucks.
But jefferson (along with marvin) are corbins favorites.
Thet are not going anywhere in th e starting lineup.
Even if kanter would have put up 30 pts and 15 rebounds in these last two starts and we win both games, marv would start when back from injury
At least for a few games to see how it works..... If it don't work, what's the harm? Helps the tank if that starting lineup sucks.
But jefferson (along with marvin) are corbins favorites.
Thet are not going anywhere in th e starting lineup.
Even if kanter would have put up 30 pts and 15 rebounds in these last two starts and we win both games, marv would start when back from injury
gregbroncs
Well-Known Member
30 MPG together is probably too much. But they should be playing 20.
addictionary
Well-Known Member
Take Kanter out, slap him sideways, put him back in.
You have a contender.
You have a contender.
GVC
Well-Known Member
Not grounded in reality. There is only one 5-man lineup in the entire league that has played more than 2 games together and plays together 20+ minutes per game. There were no 5-man 20+ MPG lineups in the NBA last season.
3 relevant links:
1. NBA Wowy! (pretty awesome stats...probably better than the NBA.com stats)
2. NBA.com league lineup stats
3. NBA.com Utah Jazz lineup stats
green
Well-Known Member
I think Enes is undervalued, but incompatible with this team.
gregbroncs
Well-Known Member
Holy ****! ESPN said it! Must be gospel, and nothing to do with the fact that none of our guys have played much to start their careers.
gregbroncs
Well-Known Member
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];717962 said:
This. But I would also COACH him instead of just yell at him. Enes is basically a high school player. All last year they were content to just let him play and suddenly this year they have different expectations. Yell all you want, that's not going to help him if there is no LOGIC behind the yelling. (Most of the time when people yell they are just repeating what they have already said, just louder. If you want someone to learn, and they don't understand it the first way you explain it, then try it a different way).
gregbroncs
Well-Known Member
Sighting against Orlando. Came in tied 58-58. up 59-58 if you don't want to count the FT Favors made just after they entered. Favors and Hayward left a few minutes later with the Jazz up 66-60.
jjscap
Well-Known Member
Looks more like CP3 to me