What's new
By:

CARLOS Boozer

gregbroncs said:
My facts are as relevant as yours. You are comparing a player in the system with the same players for a lot of years playing against a Spurs team that never played this well last year. To players playing with a new set of players against a Spurs team playing as well as they have for 4 years.
Click to expand...

You're right. It's so hard to get a rebound when you have new teammates.
 
Sloanfeld said:
You're right. It's so hard to get a rebound when you have new teammates.
Click to expand...

Good point it's soo much easier to just knock your own teammates out of the way to go get those #'s.

I'm not defending AJ he's played terrible. But pining for Boozer is retarded. That team failed and somebody had to go. Boozer is not the answer. Maybe Millsap and AJ are not either but they had to make a change and Boozer had to go.
 
One thing that is true is that if you never play help defense, you should always at least be able to box out your man. Boozer at least got that right, and partially made up for being one of the worst team defenders I've ever seen in basketball by boxing out his man. Al doesn't play help defense, nor does he box out his man, which is almost impressive in its ineptitude.
 
Last edited:
Listen Jazzfanz, I know you all hate being Sloaned but I really won't make fun of you if you just admit that we should've kept Boozer already. The Church of Sloanfeld welcomes all members.
 
Sloanfeld said:
Making up stuff is all you got left, eh?
Click to expand...

Nope. Didn't make it up. He did it repeatedly every game.

Bad stats from a limited time frame is all you got? Boozer was a stat whore. He did everything for stats including avoiding actually playing defense to get his #'s. He played well against an average Spurs team last year. So what. He had to go.
 
I'd certainly rather have Millsap starting at the 4 than Boozer, as he's a much more complete player than Boozer. I just would prefer not to have Al Jefferson starting at the 5.
 
gregbroncs said:
Nope. Didn't make it up. He did it repeatedly every game.

Bad stats from a limited time frame is all you got? Boozer was a stat whore. He did everything for stats including avoiding actually playing defense to get his #'s. He played well against an average Spurs team last year. So what. He had to go.
Click to expand...

A Spurs team that won one less game than we did and upset the two seed? lol
 
cjs55 said:
I'd certainly rather have Millsap starting at the 4 than Boozer, as he's a much more complete player than Boozer. I just would prefer not to have Al Jefferson starting at the 5.
Click to expand...

This. Millsap is a better player than Boozer. And he actually plays in most of the games.
 
Sloanfeld said:
A Spurs team that won one less game than we did and upset the two seed? lol
Click to expand...

What seed would they be if the playoffs started right now this year? And you think that Jazz team last year was better than average? Here is a clue for you they weren't.
 
Okay just to show that your selective stats are crap and your a moron.

Boozer shot 56% last year Millsap 58% this
Boozer scored 19.5 last year Millsap 21.5 this
Boozer's TO 2.7 last Millsap 1.4 this
Boozer's Reb 11.2 last Millsap 9.5 this
Their steals, Assists and Blocks have a negligible difference.

Boozer rebounded better than Millsap that's it. This despite that the Jazz have played a very tough schedule to start the year and it will get easier.

Millsap is a better PF for the Jazz.

With Boozer's chemistry issues, injuries, and horrendous contract he is not needed or wanted by this team so get over it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top