Stifle Tower
Punch Bowl Re-Filler
Let me get the crayons out and draw you a picture. Sometimes GMs tell their coaches either to play/not play a player that is likely to be involved in a trade in the near future. WHEN THIS HAPPENS, THAT IS TRADE VALUE AFFECTING THE WAY A COACH USES A PLAYER. Have you seriously never heard of a player being benched in anticipation of a trade, so as to avoid having an injury ruin it. Happens all the time(lots of records and info on past trades, use google if you know how), but I suppose you think it's reasonable to assume that when GMs have a trade in the works, they just cross their ****ing fingers and hope the coach can read their minds.
-
Rebuilding teams operate differently than teams that are a piece or two from contending. Obviously when every win counts, GMs aren't likely to tell a coach who to play, but on a rebuilding team that spent 2 1st rounders on a player who's only been in the league a year, you can bet your *** that the FO isn't going to concede failure by allowing him to be relegated to the bench, at least not anytime soon.
And GM's ARE influenced by seeing a guy play instead of just looking at the stat sheets. Certainly Ronnie Price going off against Utah was a factor in him being offered a contract by the Jazz. The highest minutes played and points scored were in two of the games against Utah. I wouldn't be a bit surprised to see Novak suddenly get more minutes in late January and February against various playoff contenders.
As for Burke, I agree with freak...much too early to write him off and there is no drawback to not starting him. Quin has already cut his minutes some and given more to Exum. Jazz are thin at PG. Unless a deal really blew them away at the deadline, I don't see Utah doing anything. I know it's still early, but I see Trey kind of bouncing around the league like Earl Watson did: a low-end starter until a team finds a better option or a decent backup if/when he eventually accepts that role.