FalseFlagg K
Well-Known Member
The vaccine had a greater than 0% rate at preventing infection. Hard to prove a negative so I doubt anyone really knows the real world prevention rate, but it was something.
Some studies show a negative efficacy, so if you had the jab you statistically had more chance of getting Covid and particularly the more boosters you had the more times you got it. Because of more risky behavioural patterns ? Maybe As you said there's no way of knowing because it wasn't tested thoroughly enough. Without dealing in absolutes or at least high likelihoods i can't see it being a reasonable expectation to ask. I see it as much more like the flu vaccine, it'll most likely help those more vulnerable and should be distributed accordingly. People who contract the flu also behave inappropriately and can recklessly spread it around to the more vulnerable if they are careless and people die from that as well.
One of the good things i've found from the Covid experience is that it's now far more acceptable to demand accountability from people who are sick to not run around coughing all over others
