Al-O-Meter
Well-Known Member
I have no problems keeping my claims straight. I acknowledged a 21% reduction in infection against the original COVID for students. We were talking about students so I used the student's rate, and that rate was against the original SARS-CoV-2. The 37% figure was for teachers against the original COVID. Neither the 21% student rate of protection or the 37% rate for teachers are valid for Delta variant due to Delta variant's R0 number being double the original's R0.Actually, you acknowledged 37% against the original strain and claim the new strain would drop it to 21%. Having trouble keeping your own claims straight?
Chicago has a mask mandate in their schools. She died. We obviously don't agree but I believe that sentiment to be selling false hope.No, it just possibly prevents her from getting covid19 while she's trying to fight leukemia.
I disagree. I think people can change their minds. Sadly it sometimes takes the death of someone close to them for their eyes to open, but people can be reached. What I don't think helps is saying "[masks] possibly prevents her from getting covid19". I believe the only way through this is getting the vaccine or getting sick and the latter path is risky.If someone thinks a 37/21% reduction justifies not getting a vaccine, they're just looking for a reason to not get the vaccine, and will always be able to come up with one.
Last edited: