(please note - playing devil's advocate here) Is that the CDC that receives something like 80 % of it's funding from the pharmaceutical industry ?? Any issue with conflict of interest let alone blatant corruption there ?? And did they provide a list of the "tests over multiple years" that they conducted ?? I agree about extremists seizing on cases like Bronny jnr etc without any evidence, that's just dumb.
However the fact that the spike protein from vaccinations has been detected in a range of body tissues including cardiac tissue when it was strictly said to remain at the location of the injection, combined with statistics such as in Australia the rate of cardiac arrests is 20 % higher than 5 years ago and excess deaths continue to run at about 15 % suggest a whole lot more investigation really should be conducted.
As for reputable .. unfortunately many institutions and companies have suffered from shoddy processed, obfuscation let alone blatant lies over the last 4 years. Pfizer were recently sanctioned AGAIN about misleading claims about the vaccine. And a recent study showed the much vaunted Paxlovid was next to useless.
https://www.medscape.com/viewarticl...-no-more-effective-than-2024a10006gb?form=fpf
There are still so many unknowns and i don't particularly believe either extreme about a lot of what is claimed.