Too close to call, come on, that's a wimpy option.
one of the few subjects in which we actually agree.Holy piss, I hope not.
Well, he certainly didn't with Cleveland. Spending $23M on 1 position is ridiculous, unless one of those players is Shaq (in his prime) or MJ. Boozer is good, maybe an all-star, but he's not a Superstar. Superstars can take over games. Superstars don't get completely shut down in a series.There have been instances in the past (I think Jordan was one example, not 100% sure, but...) where players, especially ones who were already filthy rich, would knowingly accept a salary below their market value if they thought it would really help the team win a championship. Boozer doesn't strike me as that kinda guy. AK could be one, Williams too, but Boozer? I don't think so! Homey don't play dat.
I voted no.
If the Jazz had Boozer or Okur with the Jazz, in their prime this year, I'd be happy. Mind you, I've watched 70% of their games since I was twelve - I'm thirty four n
?
are you drunk breh?