That's something I've been trying to drive at, I think it behooves the interest of all parties to sneak value out of this because if it's a headline grabber GSW is straight up going to be less likely to do it, so do the thing that is as good or better but not a headline grabber.
They can. Stepien rule only looks forward not backward.
Nice work. I hadn't worked through this aspect yet.
"Broken Condom" might work too.
post of the year
It is 4 picks because we are taking Wiggins and using assets to give them their 2030 pick back.
Not sure what assets we’d have to give up, but I’d be content to take the protection 1-20 and then turn it into multiple seconds of it doesn’t convey. If it’s one of our underperforming young players to get it done, that would be okay. . . but don’t give up real assets for fake ones. At that point, Jazz wouldn’t need another late 1st round pick - just let Washington have it.
I doubt we’ll have to watch him much, there will be plenty of “injuries” along the way
The guy must really be looking forward to his Jazz future.
Apparently he is.
I doubt it. They will play him and play him a lot. You have to give him a shot at making the all star game, especially if he has any contract incentives.
When you get Hearskys mom and Handgloten Heroes mom in the same room
Where a team (the Jazz) receives swap rights to a pick that is swappable with any other picks they own instead of just their own pick.
