I'm down for giving them Kessler just so it hurts the Spurs draft stockIf Walker is moved I am guessing it ends up being the hawks, pelicans, or lakers.
I'm down for giving them Kessler just so it hurts the Spurs draft stockIf Walker is moved I am guessing it ends up being the hawks, pelicans, or lakers.
In no situation where both parties are rational is there a real possibility that Lauri walks with the possibility of an R&E that can give him a $24 million raise on just this season (and the Jazz are still way under the salary floor).
Yeah it makes a lot of sense imo. Homecoming for Walker, JC makes sense for Atlanta, reunion with Quin. Capela we keep on the roster and keep him fresh for the trade deadline. Then either move him or waive him. Likely not getting anything for him but keep the contract just in case. Get the Kings pick which is solid but not spectacular.I just can't see anyone overpaying for Walker and it seems like that's what DA wants.
Maybe it works for the Hawks because they can overpay for Walker with the sweetener for them being us taking on Capella?
My bad, I didn't connect that you were talking about IND through your whole post.They can’t give him the contract and trade him to IND until the deadline. Any team that is trading for Lauri, which is what this thread is about, is taking on some degree of risk by trading for him in the off season.
You have to get more than one pick. You cant give up Kessler and save the Hawks money for one mediocre pick.Yeah it makes a lot of sense imo. Homecoming for Walker, JC makes sense for Atlanta, reunion with Quin. Capela we keep on the roster and keep him fresh for the trade deadline. Then either move him or waive him. Likely not getting anything for him but keep the contract just in case. Get the Kings pick which is solid but not spectacular.
We thin the herd.
Only a fraction of what the Jazz can offer on his renegotiated 24-25 salary and only teams that still have cap room (there might not be any teams in the hunt that have cap space at this point, though, in which case, Lauri would be unable to receive a max extension).Fairly dumb question: Can Lauri be traded prior the 6th and still get his extension from his destination team?
It get ms them some saving this year which don’t matter to us because we are currently below the floor. They take JCs deal on which has another year left. It saves both parties some money/space.You have to get more than one pick. You cant give up Kessler and save the Hawks money for one mediocre pick.
It gives them some breathing room but next year they need a center anyway. JC would be a good fit there as they will need some offensive creation.Hawks don't have money issues anymore. Unless I'm missing something, they are under the tax and thus Clarkson would just make their cap situation worse bc Capela is expiring.
This makes the Pels a more intriguing buyer IMO. They need a cost effective C more than ATL does.
It gives them some breathing room but next year they need a center anyway. JC would be a good fit there as they will need some offensive creation.