What's new

DOMA and Prop 8 bite the dust

Haha, yeah pretty much. I know some do think that opinion would be hateful. Again, we're screwed regardless.

Oh I agree that some would see it as hateful and start throwing out terms like bigot. Just like we are seeing now. Many people are unable, or unwilling, to think with their head instead of their emotions.
 
Oh I agree that some would see it as hateful and start throwing out terms like bigot. Just like we are seeing now. Many people are unable, or unwilling, to think with their head instead of their emotions.

Religion, human right, politics, etc are all very emotional subjects. Its almost impossible for me to hold back my emotion and passion for these subject. Hence, this thread.

And its ok. It was makes us human and not Laker fans.
 
So that right here gets me. Why does it have to be hate? Why can't it just be that he does not liek it or agree.

For example. Had a brother get into a rough life style. Booze, drugs, women...he was heading for a fast grave or a life in jail. I love my brother but I did not like the way he was living. Was my distaste rooted in hate? No and to say it was is foolish. I believe the majority of those against gay marriage fit into a similar category. Many religious folks refer to this as "love the sinner not the sin".

I will openly and freely concede that there are those against gay marriage because they are bigots and do hate gays. I believe that is the minority. Just as there are those attacking the gay marriage opponents out of bigotry and hate.

I do feel that the hate on both sides is increasing simply do to the drastic mischaraterization of each side by the other.

I agree with everything in this post. I feel that people living homosexual lifestyles are going against God's will, but I certainly don't hate them. And while part of my reason for being against gay marriage is related to that religious view, the majority of my disagreement with gay marriage (which I've posted here in jazzfanz before) has nothing to do with religion.
 
Gameface said:
However, I see a benefit that goes beyond that and I don't think there should be any limitations to a civil union. Two sisters who live together, share expenses, etc. could benefit from a civil union by legally combining their assets. I don't see why there should be any restrictions at all.

I'd be on board with that.

I've posted that idea before--that if a civil union exists for a homosexual couple (whether or not it's called a marriage), then the same thing should exist for a non-sexually-intimate couple that live together (of whatever sexes). The sisters example is a good one, I think.
 
It would be like me saying, "I think Mormonism is silly and ridiculous, and those that believe it are immoral and wrong, but I love them anyway." I may not mean that in a hateful way, but it's a pretty crappy thing to say and IMO hateful and rude.

Isn't that exactly what you are saying, though? You are saying that my church's teaching against gay marriage is silly, ridiculous, immoral, and wrong. Are you not?

For what it's worth, I don't consider your words to be hateful against Mormons, and am at a loss as to why you consider mine to be hateful against gays.
 
For what it's worth, I did the neg rep well before you gave me the pos rep. :grouphug:

I'll let you off easy this time ;)

Isn't that exactly what you are saying, though? You are saying that my church's teaching against gay marriage is silly, ridiculous, immoral, and wrong. Are you not?

For what it's worth, I don't consider your words to be hateful against Mormons, and am at a loss as to why you consider mine to be hateful against gays.

Yes, I am saying that the LDS Churches stance is all of those things. And maybe thats hateful or bigoted to some and so be it. I stand by that assertion and if that makes me a bigot to some, then oh well.

As for my opinion that your words are hateful or bigoted, thats just the way you speak makes me feel.
 
Should I be legally barred from divorce because it's not in the best interest of my child?

What other activities should be legally required and legally barred to force people to raise their children in a way we consider as "right" based on our ethnocentric value system?

forcing a mother and father to remain married does more damage.
a unhappy toxic marriage cause more damage than a divorce
 
I'll let you off easy this time ;)



Yes, I am saying that the LDS Churches stance is all of those things. And maybe thats hateful or bigoted to some and so be it. I stand by that assertion and if that makes me a bigot to some, then oh well.

As for my opinion that your words are hateful or bigoted, thats just the way you speak makes me feel.

As someone on your side of the fence (pro gay marriage) I truly feel that it is more your emotions affecting your reaction more than what Colton is saying.
 
Places like Utah, Idaho, Alabama, Louisiana, Georgia, Texas...will not pass it. I see the blue states all getting on the band wagon eventually but not the red states. Just one more thing that will divide us...

one serious question.
as an outsider i seem to like more the red states?

you are blue or red?
 
So DutchRudder is against homosexual marriage, but all about incest.

Do you sit at home and just punch yourself in the dick all day long?

i'm not for incest.
i state that if a man wants to have sex with a man. it's his free will and right to do it.
just as 2 cousins who want to have sex with eachother. its there right. i mean we cant stop it.
let them have at it.

but gay mariage and Relation marriage should not be allowed.
 
Back
Top