What's new
By:

Donald is about to go through some things...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 365
  • Start date Start date
Sardines said:
Gag orders are common, have not been struck down based on the 1st Amendment and in this case as with several other Trump cases it is completely appropriate based on his efforts to influence and intimidate witnesses, jurors, court officials, etc.. These people also gave very real danger from Trump supporters.

So maybe try again.
Click to expand...
Their excuses are becoming so sad and desperate. Throw away our entire justice system over trump. Just like they threw away Ukraine and Zelenskyy then the 2020 election and impeachment and now how many other systems must be thrown away to accommodate Trump?

It’s just easier to quit the guy, right? Stop defending him. Republicans have lost elections before. Find a replacement for him now. And if you can’t, lose this election and find someone worth fighting for in 2028. It’s just crazy how they’re going to the mats over such an empty husk of a man.
 
Sardines said:
Gag orders are common, have not been struck down based on the 1st Amendment
Click to expand...
This statement is flat out wrong. Yes, gag orders have been struck down based on First Amendment protections. There are two amendments at issue, the First and the Sixth. Most gag orders are upheld on Sixth Amendment grounds, but some gag orders have gone too far and been struck down on First Amendment grounds. Because a balance needs to be struck and each being unique in its own way, gag orders are reviewable. I believe this one goes too far, but I know for absolute fact that you are wrong about gag orders never being struck down on First Amendment grounds.
 
The Thriller said:
Their excuses are becoming so sad and desperate. Throw away our entire justice system over trump. Just like they threw away Ukraine and Zelenskyy then the 2020 election and impeachment and now how many other systems must be thrown away to accommodate Trump?

It’s just easier to quit the guy, right? Stop defending him. Republicans have lost elections before. Find a replacement for him now. And if you can’t, lose this election and find someone worth fighting for in 2028. It’s just crazy how they’re going to the mats over such an empty husk of a man.
Click to expand...
This.
It's completely nonsensical

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
Al-O-Meter said:
This statement is flat out wrong. Yes, gag orders have been struck down based on First Amendment protections. There are two amendments at issue, the First and the Sixth. Most gag orders are upheld on Sixth Amendment grounds, but some gag orders have gone too far and been struck down on First Amendment grounds. Because a balance needs to be struck and each being unique in its own way, gag orders are reviewable. I believe this one goes too far, but I know for absolute fact that you are wrong about gag orders never being struck down on First Amendment grounds.
Click to expand...
I meant that gag orders are not inherently violations of the first Amendment.

I haven't heard anything that would make this one a violation.

How would a gag order violate the 6th Amendment?
 
This is the defender of American Christianity?

This is the guy some of you defend?

This is the guy you want president again?

My goodness.

IMG_5659.jpeg
 
Sardines said:
How would a gag order violate the 6th Amendment?
Click to expand...
They don't violate the Sixth Amendment. All gag orders violate the First Amendment, but the Sixth Amendment allows for some violation of the First Amendment in the name of providing a fair trail. So long as the gag order is tailored to providing a fair trial then a reviewing judge will uphold the First Amendment violating gag order on Sixth Amendment grounds. If it extends beyond those bounds then it can be struck down. The gag order on Trump is extended out to cover people that have no bearing on the outcome of the trial, and as such would not be justified by the Sixth Amendment.
 
Red said:
Click to expand...
If only Trump could talk about this and talk about how the judge is a Biden donor and his daughter literally works for Biden. And I directly quote...

"To Whom It May Concern:

Over the past few weeks I have been asked countless times to comment on reports of an alleged sexual relationship I had with Donald Trump many, many, many years ago.

The fact of the matter is that each party to this alleged affair denied its existence in 2006, 20011, 2016, 2017 and now again in 2018. I am not denying this affair because I was paid “hush money” as has been reported in overseas owned tabloids. I am denying this affair because it never happened.

I will have no further comment on this matter. Please feel free to check me out on Instagram at @thestormydaniels.

Thank you,

Stormy Daniels"
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top