What's new

Donald is about to go through some things...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 365
  • Start date Start date
Real unbiased source….
“NEW YORK, March 6 (Reuters) - A federal appeals court on Wednesday upheld the conviction of disgraced celebrity lawyer Michael Avenatti for defrauding former client Stormy Daniels, the porn actress who claimed to have had a sexual encounter with Donald Trump.

In a 3-0 decision, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan found "overwhelming" evidence of Avenatti's guilt, and rejected his arguments that the conviction was tainted by multiple errors made by the trial judge.
 
Real unbiased source….
“NEW YORK, March 6 (Reuters) - A federal appeals court on Wednesday upheld the conviction of disgraced celebrity lawyer Michael Avenatti for defrauding former client Stormy Daniels, the porn actress who claimed to have had a sexual encounter with Donald Trump.

In a 3-0 decision, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan found "overwhelming" evidence of Avenatti's guilt, and rejected his arguments that the conviction was tainted by multiple errors made by the trial judge.
Funny you refuse to acknowledge where Stormy on multiple occasions said this never happened. Why not? Can you explain to me like I'm 2 years old what this means? Maybe you need me to explain very basic words. Remember Stormy is paying Trump for defamation... Anyways...Are these words below hard to understand? I don't get it. Actually I do. You really care about guilt. You just want to see innocent people burn.

@The Thriller can you define digitally literate? Because this below is pretty...damn... straight... forward....

"Rumors that I have received hush money from Donald Trump are completely false. If indeed I did have a relationship with Donald Trump, trust me, you wouldn't be reading about it in the news, you would be reading about it in my book. But the fact of the matter is, these stories are not true."
 
Last edited:
"My involvement with Donald Trump was limited to a few public appearances and nothing more. When I met Donald Trump, he was gracious, professional and a complete gentleman to me and EVERYONE in my presence."
 
"My involvement with Donald Trump was limited to a few public appearances and nothing more. When I met Donald Trump, he was gracious, professional and a complete gentleman to me and EVERYONE in my presence."
Yeah, funny how her trial testimony contradicts that. Was she under oath when she spoke those words? Funny how tall tales change dramatically when one is under oath….
 
Yeah, funny how her trial testimony contradicts that. Was she under oath when she spoke those words? Funny how tall tales change dramatically when one is under oath….
Lol nice try. Did you see where even CNN is calling her ********? I posted it yesterday. She literally admitted it never happened and yesterday she admitted her life goal is to get Trump.
 
Yeah, funny how her trial testimony contradicts that. Was she under oath when she spoke those words? Funny how tall tales change dramatically when one is under oath….
She has a lot in common with you guys imo. Remember as I said she paying Trump's court fees for lying under oath in another case...... I know we have our battles but you're much smarter than this Red. You know damn well she has no credibility.
Per CNN:
Her responses were disastrous," Honig said, referring to the moment when Daniels admitted that she hates Trump.

That’s a big deal," Honig said.

Trump has pleaded not guilty to 34 counts of falsifying business records in the first degree. The charges stem from a years-long investigation by the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office. The charges are related to alleged payments made ahead of the 2016 presidential election to silence Daniels about an alleged 2006 extramarital affair with Trump.

"When the witness hates the person whose liberty is at stake, that’s a big d--- deal!" Honig said. "And she’s putting out tweets, fantasizing about him being in jail.
 
Last edited:
@Red do you think it's fair that the Judge is a Biden supporter and donor? That his daughter literally works for Biden and has helped prominent Democrats make millions. I'm just curious how that's not a blatant conflict of interest to you?
 
What do you think fish? Do you think it's fair that the Judge donated to Biden and his daughter works for Biden? I understand the childish thing is to call others a troll(you think rap videos are real calling others trolls)but it's a pretty simple question.

Funny how you call others cultist yet have to bully Red into not responding. He's a big boy fish. He don't need your permission or for you to fascistly silence him ya bully.
 
Last edited:
She has a lot in common with you guys imo. Remember as I said she paying Trump's court fees for lying under oath in another case...... I know we have our battles but you're much smarter than this Red. You know damn well she has no credibility.
Per CNN:
Her responses were disastrous," Honig said, referring to the moment when Daniels admitted that she hates Trump.

That’s a big deal," Honig said.

Trump has pleaded not guilty to 34 counts of falsifying business records in the first degree. The charges stem from a years-long investigation by the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office. The charges are related to alleged payments made ahead of the 2016 presidential election to silence Daniels about an alleged 2006 extramarital affair with Trump.

"When the witness hates the person whose liberty is at stake, that’s a big d--- deal!" Honig said. "And she’s putting out tweets, fantasizing about him being in jail.
CNN is just saying stuff to say stuff. Sure, if the trial were an impartial one then it would be damaging for the key witness being shown to be unreliable via contradicting testimony and an openly stated motivation to do harm to the defendant. This isn't an impartial trial. As you've noted:

the Judge is a Biden supporter and donor? That his daughter literally works for Biden and has helped prominent Democrats make millions.

If this were an impartial trial over a real crime then Stormy wouldn't even have needed to testify. This is an effort to influence the upcoming election, and that is all it is. The DNC has weaponized the justice system so that questions over a form being filled out correctly, which wasn't even a NY State form, is the basis for a hooker having the biggest stage possible to generate compelling content showing the GOP candidate in a bad light.
 
Back
Top