Donald is about to go through some things...

[Bucknutz]

Okay?

I’m so lost. I’m not a rapist felon who’s deranged and suffering from mental illness while promoting an anti-America narrative so that I can be elected to the White House to escape criminal prosecution.

This is my exit. You complain about Steak and AL and how they troll, yet here you are doing the same. No honesty, no respect, lack of sincerity, name calling, no responding, all the attributes of a Troll.

You have no good faith in actual debates just spam posting about every word that Trump makes a mistake, or rant about a topic that you can make fun of. You have no depth, just trying for “gotcha”.

You suck the energy of this forum like Steak does but from the far left.

 

[Sardines]

Okay?

I’m so lost. I’m not a rapist felon who’s deranged and suffering from mental illness while promoting an anti-America narrative so that I can be elected to the White House to escape criminal prosecution.

Can I try?

Why do you generally say that Trump said to "stick a flashlight up your ***" when that is not what he said?

 

[Deleted member 365]

Can I try?

Why do you generally say that Trump said to "stick a flashlight up your ***" when that is not what he said?

We all saw the video. Trump suggested we shine light and inject people with disinfectant. It was an absurd and dangerous solution to Covid. Anything to downplay the virus in hopes of it helping his reelection campaign. I’ve (and I’m not the only one on here) said, “stick a flashlight up your ***” as a form of humor, not as a form of deception, as Trump uses. Whether Trump literally told people to shove flashlights down their mouths or up their asses or just use a light to kill off the virus in some sort of open chest irradiation doesn’t change the fact that his ranting are that of a deranged person. Nothing I’ve said significantly changes anything, unlike Trump, who makes stuff up and lies constantly to promote a certain anti-American narrative.

Wait, why is the focus on me?

Why aren’t we addressing how absurd it is that Trump is going on these rants in videos that I’ve posted about and reporting articles I’ve posted and the focus shines on me? I’m not running for the White House. And we shouldn’t let Trump supporters, like @Bucknutz successfully filibuster arguments against Trump’s election to turn the focus on other posters. Trump is the deranged rapist and felon who’s promoting white grievance narratives who’s running for the White House, not me.

 

[Deleted member 365]

This is my exit. You complain about Steak and AL and how they troll, yet here you are doing the same. No honesty, no respect, lack of sincerity, name calling, no responding, all the attributes of a Troll.

You have no good faith in actual debates just spam posting about every word that Trump makes a mistake, or rant about a topic that you can make fun of. You have no depth, just trying for “gotcha”.

You suck the energy of this forum like Steak does but from the far left.

If you could stop insulting me for one post, you might find greater depth than you think. You don’t get to where I am at professionally without honest debate, research, and depth with understanding of American history. That you attack me and not attack Trump’s own deranged ranting says a lot about your intellectual honesty and depth.

You still haven’t answered this WHY the military would develop ineffective tanks. I believe this is an important point because, unlike me, Trump is trying to promote a certain narrative to millions of Americans about our military.

Do you think that the military will intentionally build tanks that don't work? If so, why do you think they would/will do that?

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk

 

[LogGrad98]

Aside from all the ranting and raving going on in this thread, when did electric tanks become a hot-button topic that Donald Trump needed to fix in the first place? Did I miss a huge raging debate that Trump has finally weighed in on to help us correct this egregious error in letting our military, who is generally responsible for the greatest advancements in technology we've seen as a society, erroneously switch to the failure of electric power when every industry professional everywhere was telling them not to do it? So we needed Trump to rescue the military from such a terrible decision? Were they on the verge of completely replacing our entire fleet of tanks currently in operation until Trump got with MIT, who obviously has great respect for his intelligence, to show us yet again that the battery power is never going to be viable, first in maritime applications, and now in active war zones?

 

[str8line]

Do you think that the military will intentionally build tanks that don't work? If so, why do you think they would/will do that?

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk

Trump loves engaging in straw man arguments.

 

[str8line]

This is what you consider “incoherent gibberish”?

You complain about conservatives not coming on here and debating policies and ideas. Trump is doing that in this clip. It’s not hard to follow along. He is ripping the idea of having electric tanks because of weather, distance, weight and size while trying to make a couple of jokes.

I would debate you on this subject right now. I’m not for electric tanks at all, not until there is much more improvement in battery technology. I agree with him on all these factors.

Just because Trump says something, your opinion will be the complete opposite. Your response to this idea that diesel tanks are better than electric tanks is put the person who thinks diesel is better into nursing homes or hospice.

You didn’t even debate the factors he brought up. You could have went with it would reduce the cost (human and moving) of logistics of diesel in war zones. Or could have went with a hybrid solution.

If you want to debate, don’t use MAGA, Trump or any other scary right wing word. Just debate on facts or the context of what the other person is saying.

Did anyone say they were for electric tanks? I could see the idea being discussed of some military vehicles being electric, keeping in mind the hundreds of thousands of vehicles our military has, but tanks?

This is probably more of Trump trying to divide our country.

 

[str8line]

Can I try?

Why do you generally say that Trump said to "stick a flashlight up your ***" when that is not what he said?

Obviously he tested his brilliant groundbreaking medical breakthrough on himself by sticking a Maglite where the sun don't shine. People from MIT(or who once heard about MIT) know these things.

• "Suppose that we hit the body with a tremendous, whether it's ultraviolet or just very powerful light," Trump said at the White House coronavirus press briefing, adding: "Supposing you brought the light inside the body, which you can do either through the skin or in some other way."

 

[Sardines]

We all saw the video. Trump suggested we shine light and inject people with disinfectant. It was an absurd and dangerous solution to Covid. Anything to downplay the virus in hopes of it helping his reelection campaign. I’ve (and I’m not the only one on here) said, “stick a flashlight up your ***” as a form of humor, not as a form of deception, as Trump uses. Whether Trump literally told people to shove flashlights down their mouths or up their asses or just use a light to kill off the virus in some sort of open chest irradiation doesn’t change the fact that his ranting are that of a deranged person. Nothing I’ve said significantly changes anything, unlike Trump, who makes stuff up and lies constantly to promote a certain anti-American narrative.

Wait, why is the focus on me?

Why aren’t we addressing how absurd it is that Trump is going on these rants in videos that I’ve posted about and reporting articles I’ve posted and the focus shines on me? I’m not running for the White House. And we shouldn’t let Trump supporters, like @Bucknutz successfully filibuster arguments against Trump’s election to turn the focus on other posters. Trump is the deranged rapist and felon who’s promoting white grievance narratives who’s running for the White House, not me.

Trump was using qualifiers, like UV light can kill COVID so maybe we should look into the possibility of using that on people, like through the skin (not up the ***). Are you not able to see how the way your acting contributes to the toxicity? I get that it's intended to be humorous, but when directed at a person you disagree with it's antagonistic more than funny. Trumpers do it all the time with their silly insulting names for people, calling everything they don't like woke, or socialism, or MSM bias, or the LGBT agenda.

You're really being as obtuse and intellectually dishonest as the worst of the Trumpers with Bucknuts.

Look I'm sorry, your/our side holds their own accountable. That's not going to happen with the Trumpers, but with the never Trumpers it will.

 

[fishonjazz]

When did I say that the military would make tanks that don’t work?

In a war zone, with the technology we have now, would you rather have diesel or electric tanks?

How less efficient is the electric tank in sub temperatures compared to diesel tanks?

In an emergency, both need to refuel or recharge, which one is quicker?

What I'm saying is that Donald and yourself are complaining about battery powered tanks.
Why though? Did the military make battery powered tanks that are failing on the battlefield? Are they planning too? If the answer is no, then why the complaining about it?
Why even bring it up?
I'm guessing it was brought to for the reason he brings most things up. To make people mad at his perceived enemies.

You agreeing with trump on this "issue" (that doesn't exist) would be like if trump said "I don't think we should use electric airplane to travel to space" and you were like "ya, I agree with trump!"

Doesn't make much sense

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk

 

[str8line]

Trump was using qualifiers, like UV light can kill COVID so maybe we should look into the possibility of using that on people, like through the skin (not up the ***). Are you not able to see how the way your acting contributes to the toxicity? I get that it's intended to be humorous, but when directed at a person you disagree with it's antagonistic more than funny. Trumpers do it all the time with their silly insulting names for people, calling everything they don't like woke, or socialism, or MSM bias, or the LGBT agenda.

You're really being as obtuse and intellectually dishonest as the worst of the Trumpers with Bucknuts.

Look I'm sorry, your/our side holds their own accountable. That's not going to happen with the Trumpers, but with the never Trumpers it will.

I'm not understanding the issue here. What is intellectually dishonest about joking that The Rapist said to stick a flashlight up your ***? His schtick(which in his megalomania was actually him thinking he was smarter than scientists and doctors) was absolutely preposterous at the time. People were losing parents, wives, husbands, children to this virus and the world was panicking and we have Trump up there with the heads of Covid policy in an incredibly serious press conference throwing out complete and utter BS. What an affront to those being heavily impacted while Trump as President couldn't be bothered to take it seriously.

 

[fishonjazz]

I'm not understanding the issue here. What is intellectually dishonest about joking that The Rapist said to stick a flashlight up your ***?

I guess because the exact wording isn't being used. He never said shine a flashlight up your butt.
He said to use UV light to shine through the skin or something (I'm just going off memory from years ago so I might be off a little on the wording/phrasing)

See when being critical of trump you must be precise, specific, fair, honest etc. Even though trump is never those things when he talks about something/someone.

Anyone not named trump has to follow a different set of rules

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk